David Everitt
Photo: North West Leicestershire

North West Leicestershire planning committee

Councillor David Everitt

Thringstone wardMember, Planning Committee

Seen at planning committee from June 2025 to October 2026

  • 94%attendance
  • 10recorded votes
  • 70%with the majority
  • 50%against officer advice

As at 8 October 2026, according to Plota’s analysis of North West Leicestershire’s published minutes, Councillor David Everitt attended 16 of the 17 planning committee meetings whose minutes list them, from June 2025 to October 2026. Each member's vote is recorded on 10 decisions at those meetings: Everitt voted 7 for, 3 against. On 10 of those votes the officers’ recommendation is known, and 5 went against it.

Meetings attended
16 of 1794%
Meetings whose minutes list them as present, sending apologies or absent. Minutes that list only those present cannot show an absence.
Decisions at their meetings
31
Applications decided at the meetings they sat on, as the minutes record them.
Recorded votes
10
Decisions where the minutes, the council's recorded vote or the meeting's recording give each member's vote: 7 for, 3 against, 0 abstained.
With the majority
7 of 1070%
Votes for the resolution the committee passed. An abstention is not counted as with the majority.
Votes against officer advice
5 of 1050%
Recorded votes where the officers’ recommendation is known: for a resolution that went against it, or against one that followed it.
Divided votes
53 in the minority
Recorded votes where at least one member voted differently from the rest, and how often they were among those who did.
Declared interests
1left for 1
Decisions on which the minutes record them declaring an interest.

Voting record

Votes by quarter

7 for, 3 against, over 5 quarters with a recorded vote.

10 recorded votes, by the quarter of the meeting.

ForAgainstAbstained
036
2025
2026
Show as a table
Votes by quarter
QuarterForAgainstAbstained
Q3 2025010
Q4 2025410
Q1 2026100
Q2 2026110
Q3 2026100

Against officer advice

Everitt went against officer advice more often than the committee: 50% of votes, against 20% of decisions.

The share that went against the officers’ recommendation.

Everitt’s votes50%5 of 10
The committee’s decisions at their meetings20%5 of 25

The typical member of this committee (the median of 12 members with 5 or more such votes) voted against officer advice on 25% of them.

Agreement with other members

Voted most often with Nigel Smith (80%) and least often with Peter Moult (40%).

How often each member cast the same vote as Everitt on divided votes (where at least one member voted differently), with 5 or more such votes together.

By member

Nigel SmithConservative80%4 of 5
Jenny SimmonsConservative40%2 of 5
Peter MoultLabour40%2 of 5

By party group

Conservative4 members43%6 of 14
Labour4 members50%7 of 14
Lab Co-op2 members50%3 of 6
Independent2 members50%3 of 6
Lib Dem2 members67%4 of 6
Show as a table
Agreement with other members
MemberSame voteDivided votes togetherShare
Nigel Smith4580%
Jenny Simmons2540%
Peter Moult2540%

Attendance

94%

16 of 17 meetings whose minutes list them; apologies for 1.

The typical member of this committee attended 88% (the median of 13 members listed at 5 or more meetings).

Every meeting

Each square is a meeting whose minutes list them, oldest first.

PresentApologies
20252026

Planning Committee: 16 meetings

Show as a table
Every meeting
DateCommitteeAttendance
8 Oct 2026Planning CommitteePresent
11 Aug 2026Planning CommitteePresent
14 Jul 2026Planning CommitteePresent
9 Jun 2026Planning CommitteePresent
6 May 2026Planning CommitteePresent
14 Apr 2026Planning CommitteePresent
10 Mar 2026Planning CommitteePresent
10 Feb 2026Planning CommitteePresent
21 Jan 2026Planning CommitteePresent
9 Dec 2025Planning CommitteePresent
26 Nov 2025Planning CommitteePresent
11 Nov 2025Planning CommitteePresent
14 Oct 2025Planning CommitteePresent
9 Sep 2025Planning CommitteePresent
12 Aug 2025Planning CommitteePresent
8 Jul 2025Planning CommitteeApologies
3 Jun 2025Planning CommitteePresent

Decisions

Every application decided at a meeting they sat on, newest first, with their vote where the minutes give it.

Show
Their vote
Outcome

In the minutes

What the minutes record Everitt moving, seconding, asking or saying on each decision, in the minutes’ own words. Passages that name more than one councillor, or a member of the public, are left out.

Subjects in what the minutes record

  • Spoke
    “Councillor D Everitt, speaking as the ward member, addressed the Committee. He noted the location was unsuitable due to the proximity of other approved children’s care homes and commented that local people were concerned about the cumulative number of children in care it could have brought to the community.”
    Minutes, 14 Apr 2026, 81 Main Street Thringstone Coalville Leicestershire

How this is worked out

Everything here is read from North West Leicestershire’s published planning committee minutes, 17 meetings from June 2025 to October 2026. A councillor is matched across meetings by the council’s own member number where it has one, otherwise by full name.

Each vote shows how it is known. Named in the minutes: the minutes, or the council’s own recorded vote, list each member with their vote. From the count and the names: the minutes give the numbers and name the members in the minority, and every member present is known. All members present in favour: the minutes say every member voted for it and the members present are known. No vote against recorded: the minutes record the decision with no vote against, no abstention and no count, at a council whose minutes print a divided vote when there is one, so each member present is counted for. Unanimous vote: the minutes call the decision unanimous, or give a count with no one against and no one abstaining, and each member present is counted for. From the meeting recording: the vote was heard on the council’s recording of the meeting and closes exactly with the members present. Where none of these holds, the vote is left as “Not recorded” and is not counted.

Votes are on the resolution the committee passed, so a vote for is a vote with the majority. A vote is a decision on the application in front of the committee, not a statement of the councillor’s views. A percentage is shown only with five or more votes, decisions or meetings behind it.

Source: Plota analysis of the council’s minutes. The party is from the council’s own list of councillors.

Also on this committee

All North West Leicestershire committee councillors