Rachel Canny
Photo: North West Leicestershire

North West Leicestershire planning committee

Councillor Rachel Canny

Member, Planning Committee

Seen at planning committee from June 2025 to October 2026

  • 76%attendance
  • 9recorded votes
  • 78%with the majority
  • 25%against officer advice
  • 5motions proposed

Councillor's page on the council's website

As at 8 October 2026, according to Plota’s analysis of North West Leicestershire’s published minutes, Councillor Rachel Canny attended 13 of the 17 planning committee meetings whose minutes list them, from June 2025 to October 2026. Each member's vote is recorded on 9 decisions at those meetings: Canny voted 7 for, 1 against, 1 abstained. On 8 of those votes the officers’ recommendation is known, and 2 went against it. Canny proposed 5 motions the committee passed and seconded 3.

Meetings attended
13 of 1776%
Meetings whose minutes list them as present, sending apologies or absent. Minutes that list only those present cannot show an absence.
Decisions at their meetings
29
Applications decided at the meetings they sat on, as the minutes record them.
Recorded votes
9
Decisions where the minutes, the council's recorded vote or the meeting's recording give each member's vote: 7 for, 1 against, 1 abstained.
With the majority
7 of 978%
Votes for the resolution the committee passed. An abstention is not counted as with the majority.
Votes against officer advice
2 of 825%
Recorded votes where the officers’ recommendation is known: for a resolution that went against it, or against one that followed it.
Proposed or seconded
5 / 3
Motions the minutes say they proposed, then seconded, that the committee passed.
Divided votes
42 in the minority
Recorded votes where at least one member voted differently from the rest, and how often they were among those who did.
Declared interests
3left for 1
Decisions on which the minutes record them declaring an interest.

Voting record

Votes by quarter

7 for, 1 against, 1 abstained, over 4 quarters with a recorded vote.

9 recorded votes, by the quarter of the meeting.

ForAgainstAbstained
036
2025
2026
Show as a table
Votes by quarter
QuarterForAgainstAbstained
Q4 2025311
Q1 2026100
Q2 2026200
Q3 2026100

Against officer advice

Canny went against officer advice more often than the committee: 25% of votes, against 17% of decisions.

The share that went against the officers’ recommendation.

Canny’s votes25%2 of 8
The committee’s decisions at their meetings17%4 of 24

The typical member of this committee (the median of 12 members with 5 or more such votes) voted against officer advice on 25% of them.

Agreement with other members

Not drawn: on the 4 divided votes the minutes record, fewer than 3 other members voted beside them 5 or more times.

Motions they proposed

4 of the 5 motions Canny proposed were to approve, 1 to refuse.

The outcome of each motion the minutes say Canny proposed and the committee passed.

Approved 4Refused 1

Attendance

76%

13 of 17 meetings whose minutes list them; apologies for 4.

The typical member of this committee attended 88% (the median of 13 members listed at 5 or more meetings).

Every meeting

Each square is a meeting whose minutes list them, oldest first.

PresentApologies
20252026

Planning Committee: 13 meetings

Show as a table
Every meeting
DateCommitteeAttendance
8 Oct 2026Planning CommitteeApologies
11 Aug 2026Planning CommitteeApologies
14 Jul 2026Planning CommitteePresent
9 Jun 2026Planning CommitteePresent
6 May 2026Planning CommitteePresent
14 Apr 2026Planning CommitteePresent
10 Mar 2026Planning CommitteePresent
10 Feb 2026Planning CommitteePresent
21 Jan 2026Planning CommitteePresent
9 Dec 2025Planning CommitteePresent
26 Nov 2025Planning CommitteePresent
11 Nov 2025Planning CommitteePresent
14 Oct 2025Planning CommitteePresent
9 Sep 2025Planning CommitteeApologies
12 Aug 2025Planning CommitteeApologies
8 Jul 2025Planning CommitteePresent
3 Jun 2025Planning CommitteePresent

Decisions

Every application decided at a meeting they sat on, newest first, with their vote where the minutes give it.

Show
Their vote
Outcome

In the minutes

What the minutes record Canny moving, seconding, asking or saying on each decision, in the minutes’ own words. Passages that name more than one councillor, or a member of the public, are left out.

Subjects in what the minutes record

How this is worked out

Everything here is read from North West Leicestershire’s published planning committee minutes, 17 meetings from June 2025 to October 2026. A councillor is matched across meetings by the council’s own member number where it has one, otherwise by full name.

Each vote shows how it is known. Named in the minutes: the minutes, or the council’s own recorded vote, list each member with their vote. From the count and the names: the minutes give the numbers and name the members in the minority, and every member present is known. All members present in favour: the minutes say every member voted for it and the members present are known. No vote against recorded: the minutes record the decision with no vote against, no abstention and no count, at a council whose minutes print a divided vote when there is one, so each member present is counted for. Unanimous vote: the minutes call the decision unanimous, or give a count with no one against and no one abstaining, and each member present is counted for. From the meeting recording: the vote was heard on the council’s recording of the meeting and closes exactly with the members present. Where none of these holds, the vote is left as “Not recorded” and is not counted.

Votes are on the resolution the committee passed, so a vote for is a vote with the majority. A vote is a decision on the application in front of the committee, not a statement of the councillor’s views. A percentage is shown only with five or more votes, decisions or meetings behind it.

Source: Plota analysis of the council’s minutes. The party is from the council’s own list of councillors.

Also on this committee

All North West Leicestershire committee councillors