Listed church conversion at Worthington Methodist Church Main Street, Worthington
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by North West Leicestershire Planning Committee on 11 Nov 2025.
What was proposed
Internal and external alterations were proposed to convert the listed Methodist church into a dwelling.
“Internal and external alterations to facilitate the use of the building as a dwelling (Listed Building Consent)”
Officer report
Earlier applications and works
Earlier applications were withdrawn, while internal timber cladding had been removed before listed building consent was obtained and referred to enforcement.
“MAIN REPORT 1. Proposals and Background This application seeks listed building consent for internal and external alterations to facilitate the use of the building as a dwelling. Worthington Methodist Church is a Grade II listed building. It should be noted that works to the building including the removal of timber cladding internally have taken place prior to obtaining the necessary listed building consent.”
“Further information submitted in respect of the application can be found on the District Council’s website. Relevant Planning History In March 2023 planning permission was sought for the use of the listed building as a dwelling (23/00413/FUL). The application was accompanied by an associated listed building consent application (23/00414/LBC). Both applications were withdrawn in September 2023. This application is a resubmission of the listed building consent application.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval subject to conditions controlling repairs, materials, structural support, heritage recording and other details.
“Notwithstanding the submitted details or condition 1 above, prior to any further works taking place full details of restoration and/or repair details, including details of materials and methods, for the following works shall first be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority:”
“(a) the finish to be applied to the external faces of the partition walls and how this would reflect the finishes in the principal internal space; (b) amended proposed ground floor plan showing an alterative bathroom wall layout to ensure that the partition wall closest to the entrance forms a straight line; (c) the balustrade serving the bed deck area; (d) the cavity drainage system; (e) full details of an alternative structural support method for the first floor bed deck…”
Officer report
Heritage effects
Officers found heritage harm from removed cladding and the bin enclosure, but considered restoration and the building’s continued use sufficient justification.
“(k) Removal of internal timber cladding; Prior to the commencement of works to the Listed Building, a dado rail was mounted to the internal walls with wide ‘bead and butt’ cladding installed above the dado rail. Modern ‘beauty board’ cladding was also installed below the dado rail. This timber cladding has been removed from the walls of the building prior to obtaining listed building consent.”
“Conclusion The works taken place relating to the removal of timber cladding internally has resulted in heritage harm to the listed building which has not been supported by clear and convincing justification as required by Paragraph 213 of the NPPF. Furthermore, the removal of the cladding fails to retain features which form part of the significance of the heritage asset as required by Policy He1(b) of the Local Plan (2021).”
Officer report
Objections and support
The parish council and three letters raised objections, including heritage and practical concerns; one letter supported conversion in principle.
“Objections from: Worthington Parish Council Comments made by: NWLDC Conservation Officers. Third Party Representations Three letters of objection have been received with the comments raised summarised as follows: Grounds of Objections…”
“One of the three letters of objection also offers support for the proposed conversion in principle.”
Officer report
Committee discussion
Members supported restoring an unused listed building but asked about external issues and whether work could address its condition.
“A discussion was had during which members expressed support for the application which, if approved, could restore an unused listed building.”
“Members were surprised that there had been no application to resolve the building’s external issues and questioned whether alterations could be made to the exterior of the building due to its condition.”
Minutes
The vote
Councillors voted for the motion to permit the application in accordance with the officer recommendation, and it was carried.
“The application be permitted in accordance with the officer’s recommendations.”
“Recorded Vote (Motion) Councillor Dave Bigby For Councillor Morgan Burke For Councillor Rachel Canny For Councillor David Everitt For Councillor John Legrys For Councillor Peter Moult For Councillor Carol Sewell For Councillor Jenny Simmons For Councillor Nigel Smith For Councillor Michael Wyatt For Councillor Richard Blunt For Carried…”
Minutes
Sources
- North West Leicestershire Planning Committee minutes, 11 November 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of North West Leicestershire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- North West Leicestershire
- Date
- Tuesday 11 November 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- North West Leicestershire committee decisions →
This committee's year
10 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.