Development at Ringstead, Hermitage Walk, South Woodford, London Data via plota.co.uk

2038/26 - Section 73 - Minor Approved

Proposal

Variation of Condition 2 of approved planning permission 2911/25: adjustments to Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
3 Aug 2026
✓
Validated
7 Aug 2026
✓
Consultation
14 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
30 Oct 2026

Approved on 30 Oct 2026 · Delegated C/Signed C. Zhandire · Last checked 30 Oct 2026

Associated applications 3

Site constraints 32

LBR LP39 (Nature Conservation and Biodiversity)LBR LP38 (Protecting Trees and Enhancing the Landscape)LBR LP30 (Household Extensions)LBR LP29 (Amenity and Internal Space Standards)LBR LP26 (Promoting High Quality Design)LBR LP23 (Cycle and Car Parking)LBR LP5 (Dwelling Mix)LBR LP2 (Delivering Housing Growth)LP D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach)LP D6 (Housing quality and standards)LP D12 (Fire safety)LP G6 (Biodiversity and access to nature)LP SI.5 (Water infrastructure)LP T5 (Cycling)LP T6.1 (Residential parking)NPPF S3 Presumption in favour of sustainable developmentNPPF S4 Principle of development within settlementsNPPF HO7 Meeting the need for homesNPPF L2 Making effective use of landNPPF DP3 Key principles for well-designed placesNPPF TR4 Street design, access and parkingNPPF P3 Living conditions and pollutionNPPF F4 Assessing flood risk for decision-makingNPPF N2 Improving the natural environment
Air quality management area: Redbridge AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Conservation area 7 m away: Snaresbrook
The edge of the area; work outside it can still affect its setting.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Special area of conservation 280 m away: Epping Forest
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
LBR LP39 (Nature Conservation and Biodiversity)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LBR LP38 (Protecting Trees and Enhancing the Landscape)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LBR LP30 (Household Extensions)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LBR LP29 (Amenity and Internal Space Standards)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LBR LP26 (Promoting High Quality Design)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LBR LP23 (Cycle and Car Parking)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LBR LP5 (Dwelling Mix)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LBR LP2 (Delivering Housing Growth)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LP D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LP D6 (Housing quality and standards)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LP D12 (Fire safety)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LP G6 (Biodiversity and access to nature)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LP SI.5 (Water infrastructure)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LP T5 (Cycling)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
LP T6.1 (Residential parking)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF S3 Presumption in favour of sustainable developmentCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF S4 Principle of development within settlementsCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF HO7 Meeting the need for homesCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF L2 Making effective use of landCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF DP3 Key principles for well-designed placesCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF TR4 Street design, access and parkingCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF P3 Living conditions and pollutionCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF F4 Assessing flood risk for decision-makingCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
NPPF N2 Improving the natural environmentCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
SSSI 280 m away: Epping Forest SSSI; 1 listed building within 150 m; Inside the Redbridge built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 2 (poor), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redbridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Redbridge
Application type
Section 73 - Minor
Received
3 Aug 2026
Validated
7 Aug 2026
Ward
Wanstead Village
Case officer
Show
Target decision
1 Oct 2026
Decision date
30 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated C/Signed C. Zhandire
Applicant
Show
Agent
Des Ewing Residential Architects

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15127375
Comments by
2 Sept 2026
Site or press notice
12 Aug 2026
Statutory expiry
4 Sept 2026
Redbridge
Planning Authority Score
4.5/10
Below average
#174 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Redbridge ranks #129 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Redbridge is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redbridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #292 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #267 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #129 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #90 of 296
57%
Minor dwellings approved
152 decided (1-9 homes)
83%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
32%
Change of use approved
192 decided
1,673
Total decisions
461 refused in the year to March 2026