The Priory CE Primary School Wick Lane Christchurch BH23 1HX Data via plota.co.uk

P/26/03284/TCA - Tree work in a Conservation Area Approved

Proposal

T3 Sycamore - Remove epicormic shoots main stem. Prune tertiary / secondary branches to create 2m separation between structure and first foliage or bud T4 Alder - Prune tertiary branches to create 2m separation between structures and first foliage or bud T6 Cherry - Crown-Lift tertiary branches to underside of low primary branches. T8 Ash - Fell. T10 Apple- Fell. T11 Whitebeam - Remove crossing branches Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
14 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
24 Aug 2026

Approved on 24 Aug 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 1 Oct 2026

Site constraints 11

Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Christchurch Central conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Article 4 direction
Hovercraft in the Solent. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Scheduled monument about 98 m away: Site of Town Walls in, and E of, Druitt Gardens
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Nationally important archaeology protected by the Secretary of State. Work that affects the monument or its setting is rarely permitted.
Historic England ↗
Special protection area about 223 m away: Solent and Dorset Coast
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
12 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: 9-11, SILVER STREET (See details for further address information), Grade II, about 59 m from the postcode pin · 1 Grade II*, 11 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 12 with distances
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
SSSI about 305 m away: Christchurch Harbour SSSI; National infrastructure project about 1691 m away: Navitus Bay Wind Park; Inside the Christchurch (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) built-up area; Priority habitat about 35 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Not green belt

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in BCP - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
BCP
Application type
Tree work in a Conservation Area
Postcode
BH23 1HX
Received
14 Jul 2026
Validated
14 Jul 2026
Ward
Christchurch Town
Parish
Christchurch Town Council
Case officer
Show
Decision
No objections raised
Decision date
24 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Tree Logic

How this decision compares

Decided in 41 days from validation, 17 days faster than BCP's median of 58 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 96% of tree and landscaping works here are.

45%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
1,638decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by BCP in the last twelve months, from validation. BCP decision record →

BCP
Planning Authority Score
1.7/10
Poor
#279 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

BCP is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #256 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 60% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
BCP decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #233 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #214 of 296
44%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #256 of 296
60%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #267 of 296
67%
Minor dwellings approved
346 decided (1-9 homes)
68%
Major dwellings approved
56 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
78 decided
2,244
Total decisions
392 refused in the year to March 2026