Teesside Grange A67 From Urlay Nook Road To Airport Eaglescliffe Stockton-On-Tees TS16 0QH Data via plota.co.uk

26/1520/DCH - Discharge Conditions Approved

Proposal

Information to discharge condition no6 (Archaeological WSI (b)) of planning approval - Installation of a solar panel array, with security fencing, CCTV cameras, transformer equipment and connection room, and storage and electrical equipment containers, and associated works to form an access track. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
7 Aug 2026
✓
Consultation
7 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
26 Aug 2026

Approved on 26 Aug 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 29 Aug 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 6 discharged

    • ConditionsInformation to discharge condition no6 (Archaeological WSI (b)) - Installation of a solar…This application26/1520/DCH

Site constraints 2

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Stockton-on-Tees - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Discharge Conditions
Postcode
TS16 0QH
Received
7 Aug 2026
Validated
7 Aug 2026
Ward
Eaglescliffe West
Parish
Aislaby And Newsham Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Oct 2026
Decision
Discharged Conditions
Decision date
26 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Town Planning Services

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 29 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15141686
Planning Portal ref
PP-15141686
Consultation
7 Aug 2026
Comments by
28 Aug 2026
Statutory expiry
2 Oct 2026
Env. assessment
No
Stockton-on-Tees
Planning Authority Score
5.8/10
Average
#112 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Stockton-on-Tees ranks #180 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Stockton-on-Tees decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #67 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #44 of 296
61%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #180 of 296
40%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #155 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
19 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
44 decided
612
Total decisions
41 refused in the year to March 2026