9 Romans Field Silchester Hampshire RG7 2QH Data via plota.co.uk

T/00302/26/TPO - Works to Trees - TPO Approved

Proposal

T1 Sycamore: Remove 2 lower branches over garden (see B1 & B2 on attached annotated photo). Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
7 Jul 2026
Validated
9 Jul 2026
Approved
13 Aug 2026

Approved on 13 Aug 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 17 Aug 2026

Site constraints 6

Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI 95 m away: Pamber Forest and Silchester Common SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Conservation area 21 m away: Silchester
The edge of the area; work outside it can still affect its setting.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Also on the record
3 listed buildings within 150 m; Scheduled monument 247 m away: Flex Ditch; Inside the Silchester built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Basingstoke - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to Trees - TPO
Postcode
RG7 2QH
Received
7 Jul 2026
Validated
9 Jul 2026
Ward
Bramley
Parish
SILCHESTER CP
Case officer
Show
Target decision
3 Sept 2026
Decision
Granted
Decision date
13 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
NP Tree Management Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 35 days from validation, 7 days slower than Basingstoke's median of 28 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 94% of tree and landscaping works here are.

98%decided within 8 weeks
94%approved
278decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Basingstoke in the last twelve months, from validation. Basingstoke decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 17 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15066019
Env. assessment
No
Basingstoke
Planning Authority Score
5.1/10
Average
#143 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Basingstoke ranks #189 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Basingstoke decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #75 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #49 of 296
59%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #189 of 296
46%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #198 of 296
75%
Minor dwellings approved
150 decided (1-9 homes)
63%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
32 decided
1,076
Total decisions
90 refused in the year to March 2026