100 Piccadilly London W1J 7NH Data via plota.co.uk

25/06948/LBC - Listed Building Consent Application Approved

Proposal

Internal alterations to enable a reconfiguration of the proposed commercial floor space; removal of residents gym at basement level; Internal adjustments at all levels; retention of basement car park and car lift; retention of existing rear external fire escape stair and windows to Flats 6 & 8; Alterations to massing; Design adjustments to White Horse Street and Piccadilly frontages, and amendments to new residential entrance on White Horse Street. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
26 Sept 2025
✓
Validated
2 Oct 2025
✓
Approved
3 Jun 2026

Approved on 3 Jun 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 12 Oct 2026

Documents 62

Plans & drawings 34

PDF LOCATION PLAN Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL BASEMENTFLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL GROUNDFLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL MEZZANINEFLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL FIRSTFLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL SECONDFLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL THIRDFLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL FOURTHFLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL FIFTHFLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL SIXTHFLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL_PICCADILLY_ELEVATION Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL_WHITEHORSESTREETELEVATION Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL_COURTYARD_ELEVATION Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL_GARDEN_ELEVATION Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL_YARMOUTH_PLACE_ELEVATION Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FABRIC REMOVAL_SECTION_DD Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_SUBBASEMENT_FLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_BASEMENT_FLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_GROUND_FLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_MEZZ_FLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_FIRST_FLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_SECOND_FLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_THIRD_FLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_FOURTH_FLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_FIFTH_FLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_SIXTH_FLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_SEVENTH_FLOOR Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_ROOF_PLAN Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_PICCADILLY_ELEVATION Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED WHITE HORSE STREET ELEVATION Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_COURTYARD_ELEVATION Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_GARDEN_ELEVATION Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_YARMOUTH_PLACE_ELEVATION Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED_SECTION_AA Drawing · 26 Sept 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 14

Grade II listed: 96 and 97, Piccadilly W1
List entry 1226749 · The pin is inside its outline · 52 more listed buildings within 150 m (3 Grade I, 1 Grade II*, 48 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 52 with distances
Historic England ↗
Mayfair conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Article 4 direction
Article 4 Basement Development Permitted Rights Removed. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Archaeological priority area: City of Westminster APA 2.5
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Westminster AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Registered park or garden 36 m away: Green Park
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Central activities zone
The core of central London in the London Plan.
Offices, culture and the other strategic functions of the centre take priority over new housing here.
National infrastructure project 1027 m away: Thames Tideway Tunnel
The site is 1027 m from the project boundary. Waste water treatment, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted. Also within 2 km: London Strategic Heat Main Project (at pre-application, 838 m).
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Also on the record
Heritage at risk 22 m away: 95, Piccadilly; Inside the City of Westminster built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 6b (excellent), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; Metropolitan Open Land 20 m away; Priority habitat 34 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Westminster - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Listed Building Consent Application
Postcode
W1J 7NH
Received
26 Sept 2025
Validated
2 Oct 2025
Ward
West End
Case officer
Show
Target decision
20 May 2026
Decision
Application Permitted
Decision date
3 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Savills

How this decision compares

Decided in 244 days from validation, 187 days slower than Westminster's median of 57 for listed building works. Approved, as 90% of listed building works here are.

49%decided within 8 weeks
90%approved
2,227decided in the last year

Plota live figures for listed building works decided by Westminster in the last twelve months, from validation. Westminster decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 12 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14363268
Planning Portal ref
PP-14363268
Env. assessment
No
Westminster
Planning Authority Score
3.5/10
Below average
#221 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Westminster is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #258 out of 296. Only 28% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Westminster is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 81% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 81% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Westminster decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
86%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #201 of 296
81%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #277 of 296
44%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #258 of 296
28%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #46 of 296
83%
Minor dwellings approved
12 decided (1-9 homes)
67%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
133 decided
4,602
Total decisions
648 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use