Baker Barracks Emsworth Road Thorney Island Emsworth West Sussex PO10 8DH Data via plota.co.uk

Proposal

Erection of 1 no. changing facility and erection of 1 no. office building, together with associated plant, photovoltaic panels, hard and soft landscaping Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
3 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
12 Mar 2026
✓
Consultation
30 Mar 2026
✓
Approved
29 May 2026

Approved on 29 May 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 7 Jul 2026

Documents 26

Statements & assessments 11

PDF WSCC LEAD LOCAL FLOOD AUTHORITY 20.03.26 Consultee Comment · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Z916261Y19-KIE-ZZ-WLS-AS-10000102-HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT-H00300-XX-AC HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT Application Documents · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Z916261Y19-KIE-ZZ-ZZ-AS-C-10000485-FLOOD RIXK ASSESSMENT-F01100-XX-AC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT Application Documents · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Z916261Y19-KIE-8.6.4.1-ZZ-SG-C-10000459-DRAINAGE AND SUDS STRATEGY-F01100-XX-AC DRAINAGE AND SUDS STRATEGY Application Documents · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Z916261Y19-HNW-XX-XX-RP-A-10105010 DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Application Documents · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN METRIC Application Documents · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Z916261Y19-KIE-XX-ZZ-RP-O-10000466-ARBORICULTURAL IMPLICATIONS ASSESSMENT-F01100 TREE ARBORICULTURAL IMPLICATIONS ASSESSMENT AND METHOD STATEMENT Application Documents · 3 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Z916261Y19-KIE-ZZ--BAKE00-RP-ES-10000464-BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN FEASIBILITY STUDY BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT REPORT Application Documents · 3 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Z916261Y19-KIE-ZZ--WLS-AS-O-10000468-ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT-F01100-XX-AC R ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Application Documents · 3 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Z916261Y19-KIE-ZZ--WLS-RP-O-10000469-PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL-F01100-XX- PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL REPORT Application Documents · 3 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Z916261Y19-KIE-ZZ-BAKE00-LT-O-10000457-PLANNING STATEMENT-F01100-XX-AC PLANNING STATEMENT Application Documents · 3 Mar 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

Site constraints 8

Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Nutrient neutrality catchment: Solent: Includes Chichester and Langstone Harbours SPA/Ramsar, Solent and Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar, Solent Maritime SAC, Portsmouth Harbour SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Chichester Harbour National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
South Hayling Island to East Head across the site
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site; the route and its margin are protected.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 3; Priority habitat about 8 m away: Good quality semi improved grassland; Inside the West Thorney built-up area.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Chichester - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Chichester
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
PO10 8DH
Received
3 Mar 2026
Validated
12 Mar 2026
Ward
Southbourne
Parish
West Thorney
Case officer
Show
Target decision
7 May 2026
Decision
PERMIT
Decision date
29 May 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Vail WIlliams LLP

How this decision compares

Decided in 78 days from validation, 24 days slower than Chichester's median of 54 for commercial and major works. Approved, as 89% of commercial and major works here are.

76%decided within 8 weeks
89%approved
54decided in the last year

Plota live figures for commercial and major works decided by Chichester in the last twelve months, from validation. Chichester decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14666152
Planning Portal ref
PP-14666152
Consultation
30 Mar 2026
Comments by
14 Apr 2026
Statutory expiry
7 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Chichester
Planning Authority Score
8.9/10
Excellent
#6 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Chichester is one of the fastest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #10 out of 296. Only 18% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Among the fastest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Chichester decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #127 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #72 of 296
93%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #10 of 296
18%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #15 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
110 decided (1-9 homes)
76%
Major dwellings approved
17 decided (10+ homes)
74%
Change of use approved
34 decided
935
Total decisions
107 refused in the year to March 2026