The Toll House Holme Lane Holme Pierrepont Nottinghamshire NG12 2LD Data via plota.co.uk

26/01301/TPO - Tree Preservation Order Approved

Proposal

T1 (Lime) - Target Prune the limbs growing towards the house and over the road with a view of reducing these by up to 2m to a suitable growth point to make the canopy more uniform, remove major deadwood throughout the canopy and remove epicormic growth to crown break, thin canopy by up to 15% Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
30 Jul 2026
✓
Consultation
8 Sept 2026
✓
Approved
8 Sept 2026

Approved on 8 Sept 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 10 Sept 2026

Site constraints 9

Green belt: Derby and Nottingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Flood zone 2, rivers and sea
Medium chance: between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000 annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 to 1 in 1,000 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Registered park or garden: Holme Pierrepont Hall
Nationally designated heritage. Its significance and setting carry great weight.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Public byway open to all traffic 29 m away; Radon affected area, class 2; 1 listed building within 150 m; Coalfield, development low risk area; Priority habitat 32 m away: Deciduous woodland; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rushcliffe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rushcliffe
Application type
Tree Preservation Order
Postcode
NG12 2LD
Received
30 Jul 2026
Validated
30 Jul 2026
Ward
Gamston
Parish
Holme Pierrepont & Gamston
Case officer
Show
Target decision
24 Sept 2026
Decision
Grant consent subject to conditions
Decision date
8 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 40 days from validation, 5 days faster than Rushcliffe's median of 45 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 95% of tree and landscaping works here are.

84%decided within 8 weeks
95%approved
38decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Rushcliffe in the last twelve months, from validation. Rushcliffe decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

12 neighbours consulted · Last counted 10 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
31 Jul 2026
Consultation
8 Sept 2026
Comments by
29 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
24 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
Rushcliffe
Planning Authority Score
3.8/10
Below average
#208 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rushcliffe is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #233 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rushcliffe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #91 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #89 of 296
51%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #233 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #227 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
13 decided
761
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use