Firs Farm Holme Lane Holme Pierrepont Nottinghamshire NG12 2LD Data via plota.co.uk

26/01404/FUL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Replacement of Defective Roof to Dis-used Workshop and Stores Building Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
19 Aug 2026
✓
Validated
20 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
9 Oct 2026
✓
Consultation
12 Oct 2026

Approved on 9 Oct 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 13 Oct 2026

Documents 8

Statements & assessments 2

PDF FLOOD TICKSHEET Flood Risk Assessment · 20 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Name hidden Show Design & Access Statement · 18 Aug 2026 View ↗

Consultation & comments 2

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Consultee Comment · 5 Oct 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Consultee Comment · 22 Sept 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

Green belt: Derby and Nottingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Registered park or garden 180 m away: Holme Pierrepont Hall; Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rushcliffe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rushcliffe
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
NG12 2LD
Received
19 Aug 2026
Validated
20 Aug 2026
Ward
Gamston
Parish
Holme Pierrepont & Gamston
Case officer
Show
Target decision
15 Oct 2026
Decision
Application Permitted (conditional)
Decision date
9 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Belvoir Architecture

How this decision compares

Decided in 50 days from validation, 25 days faster than Rushcliffe's median of 75 for commercial premises. Approved, as 89% of commercial premises here are.

46%decided within 8 weeks
89%approved
40decided in the last year

Plota live figures for commercial premises decided by Rushcliffe in the last twelve months, from validation. Rushcliffe decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

12 neighbours consulted · Last counted 13 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
10 Sept 2026
Consultation
12 Oct 2026
Comments by
2 Nov 2026
Site or press notice
4 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
15 Oct 2026
Env. assessment
No
Rushcliffe
Planning Authority Score
3.8/10
Below average
#208 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rushcliffe is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #233 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rushcliffe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #91 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #89 of 296
51%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #233 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #227 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
13 decided
761
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026