Two-bedroom dwelling at Post Office Main Road Eyam
Summary of planning committee decision
Deferred by Peak District Planning Committee on 5 Dec 2025.
What was proposed
The application sought permission to demolish the former post office and build a two-bedroom, two-storey dwelling with limited landscaping.
“FULL APPLICATION – PROPOSED DEMOLITION OF EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND PROPOSED NEW 2-STOREY DOMESTIC 2-BEDROOM DWELLING AND ASSOCIATED LIMITED LANDSCAPING at POST OFFICE, MAIN ROAD EYAM (NP/DDD/0625/0591) WE”
“This application seeks full planning permission for the demolition of the Post Office building and the erection of a 2-bedroom dwelling.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site is a former single-storey post office in Eyam Conservation Area, near two grade II listed buildings and in a predominantly residential area.
“The development site is the Post Office building located on Main Road in the centre of Eyam.”
“The site is in the Eyam Conservation Area. The neighbour to the north, Laburnum Cottage is a grade II listed building. Two properties to the south of the site are Hall Farmhouse, a grade II listed building. The area is predominantly residential.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
Earlier permissions covered the post office and its extension, while a 2024 application to change its use to a dwelling was withdrawn.
“1985 - NP/WED/1284/500 – Extension to post office – Granted conditionally…”
“2024 – NP/DDD/1224/1358 – Change of use of post office to dwelling – Application withdrawn following unfavourable comments from planning officer…”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended conditional approval, finding the building’s replacement would enhance the conservation area and that community, heritage, amenity and highway impacts were acceptable.
“The application has been supported by a viability and marketing exercise which has successfully demonstrated that the building is not viable for an alternative community use or affordable housing, with evidence of reasonable attempts to market the building for an alternative commercial use which has proven unsuccessful.”
“The proposed dwelling would facilitate the removal of a poor-quality building which detracts from the Eyam Conservation Area, providing a replacement which reflects and complements the prevailing form and vernacular of the street-scene.”
Officer report
Public speakers
Three objectors spoke under the public participation scheme, including one statement read out by Democratic Services staff.
The committee vote
A motion to defer the application for further boundary, ownership and building-size discussions was moved, seconded and carried.
“A motion to defer the application to allow further discussion regarding the boundary of this site and ownership, along with the size of the building, was moved, seconded, put to the vote and carried. If the issues can be resolved then the decision to be delegated to officers, if not then the application to be brought back to the committee for a decision.”
Minutes
What was decided
The application was deferred for discussions about treating the boundary, clarifying ownership, and considering whether the building’s size could be reduced to allow servicing.
“That the application be DEFERRED to allow for further discussions between the Applicant and the Planning Officer regarding:”
“The massing of the proposed building on a small site and if the size of the proposed building could be reduced as the current footprint does not allow for servicing of the building.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
“Members felt it appeared to be a positive approach to remove the current building and replace it with a more attractive building.”
“Members felt there would be too much massing on such a small site and questioned if it would be possible to reduce the size of the building.”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- Peak District Planning Committee minutes, 5 December 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Peak District's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Peak District Planning Committee
- Council
- Peak District
- Date
- Friday 5 December 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Deferred
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Peak District committee decisions →
This committee's year
31 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.