Hounslow planning committee

Councillor John Stroud-Turp

Member, Planning Committee

Seen at planning committee from June 2025 to March 2026

  • 86%attendance
  • 16agreed, no vote against recorded
  • 18decisions at their meetings
  • 2motions proposed

Councillor's page on the council's website

As at 3 September 2026, according to Plota’s analysis of Hounslow’s published minutes, Councillor John Stroud-Turp attended 6 of the 7 planning committee meetings whose minutes list them, from June 2025 to March 2026. On 16 other decisions the minutes record no vote against, so Stroud-Turp is counted as agreeing; they are left out of the shares below. Stroud-Turp proposed 2 motions the committee passed and seconded 4.

Meetings attended
6 of 786%
Meetings whose minutes list them as present, sending apologies or absent. Minutes that list only those present cannot show an absence.
Decisions at their meetings
18
Applications decided at the meetings they sat on, as the minutes record them.
Agreed, no vote against recorded
16
Decisions the minutes record with no vote against and no count. Counted as agreeing, and left out of the shares.
Proposed or seconded
2 / 4
Motions the minutes say they proposed, then seconded, that the committee passed.
Declared interests
0
Decisions on which the minutes record them declaring an interest.

Voting record

The minutes we hold do not give each member's vote at these meetings, so no vote is counted for Stroud-Turp and no voting chart is drawn. The minutes do name who proposed each motion.

Attendance

86%

6 of 7 meetings whose minutes list them; apologies for 1.

The typical member of this committee attended 86% (the median of 15 members listed at 5 or more meetings).

Every meeting

Each square is a meeting whose minutes list them, oldest first.

PresentApologies
20252026

Planning Committee: 6 meetings

Show as a table
Every meeting
DateCommitteeAttendance
5 Mar 2026Planning CommitteePresent
5 Feb 2026Planning CommitteePresent
4 Dec 2025Planning CommitteePresent
6 Nov 2025Planning CommitteePresent
4 Sep 2025Planning CommitteePresent
7 Aug 2025Planning CommitteePresent
12 Jun 2025Planning CommitteeApologies

Decisions

Every application decided at a meeting they sat on, newest first, with their vote where the minutes give it.

Show
Their vote
Outcome

In the minutes

What the minutes record Stroud-Turp moving, seconding, asking or saying on each decision, in the minutes’ own words. Passages that name more than one councillor, or a member of the public, are left out.

Subjects in what the minutes record

  • Spoke
    “Cllr John Stroud-Turp advised that the initial proposal for the sites had been approved but due to changes in building regulations post-Grenfell, had to be revised. He described the existing building on the police station site as an eyesore which needed to be replaced and the Watermans building as a highly inefficient concrete block, to be replaced by much needed housing.”
    Minutes, 5 Feb 2026, Metropolitan Police Half Acre, Brentford
  • Moved approval
    “Cllr Stroud-Turp moved approval of the officer’s recommendations, seconded by Cllr Bowring.”
    Minutes, 5 Feb 2026, Metropolitan Police Half Acre, Brentford
  • Spoke
    “Cllr Stroud-Turp advised that members were only asking for a pipe, not to dig a borehole, so soil contamination was not an issue.”
    Minutes, 5 Feb 2026, Metropolitan Police Half Acre, Brentford
  • Seconded
    “Cllr Mosley moved approval of the officer’s recommendations including the above added condition, seconded by Cllr Stroud-Turp.”
    Minutes, 5 Feb 2026, Metropolitan Police Half Acre, Brentford
  • Spoke
    “Cllr John Stroud-Turp advised that the initial proposal for the sites had been approved but due to changes in building regulations post-Grenfell, had to be revised. He described the existing building on the police station site as an eyesore which needed to be replaced and the Watermans building as a highly inefficient concrete block, to be replaced by much needed housing.”
    Minutes, 5 Feb 2026, 40 High Street, Brentford
  • Moved approval
    “Cllr Stroud-Turp moved approval of the officer’s recommendations, seconded by Cllr Bowring.”
    Minutes, 5 Feb 2026, 40 High Street, Brentford
  • Spoke
    “Cllr Stroud-Turp advised that members were only asking for a pipe, not to dig a borehole, so soil contamination was not an issue.”
    Minutes, 5 Feb 2026, 40 High Street, Brentford
  • Seconded
    “Cllr Mosley moved approval of the officer’s recommendations including the above added condition, seconded by Cllr Stroud-Turp.”
    Minutes, 5 Feb 2026, 40 High Street, Brentford
  • Spoke on flooding and drainage
    “During the debate Cllr John Stroud-Turp expressed appreciation that the Planning Team had not recommended a proposed scheme without taking investigation of the flood defences into account and he acknowledged that no developer would risk the costs involved in all the necessary work without assurance that the scheme could go ahead.”
    Minutes, 5 Feb 2026, HAM WHARF THE HAM, BRENTFORD
  • Seconded
    “Cllr Mosley moved approval of the officer’s recommendations including the above added condition, seconded by Cllr Stroud-Turp.”
    Minutes, 5 Feb 2026, HAM WHARF THE HAM, BRENTFORD
  • Asked a question
    “Cllr John Stroud-Turp asked for more clarity on claims that there had been a lack of consultation and last-minute changes to the application.”
    Minutes, 5 Feb 2026, 51 Thornbury Road, Isleworth
  • Spoke
    “The scheme had merits as well as downsides but Cllr Stroud-Turp felt that on balance the addition of muchneeded homes led him to second Cllr Bruce’s motion to approve.”
    Minutes, 5 Feb 2026, 51 Thornbury Road, Isleworth
  • Seconded
    “Cllr Bruce moved approval of the officer’s recommendations seconded by Cllr Stroud-Turp.”
    Minutes, 5 Feb 2026, 51 Thornbury Road, Isleworth
  • Spoke
    “Cllr John Stroud-Turp agreed that the Council could only give the rail operators the best platform to proceed.”
    Minutes, 4 Dec 2025, 389 Chiswick High Road, Chiswick, London
  • Spoke on affordable housing
    “Cllr Stroud-Turp expressed the view that the Application was at least the best short-term use of the office tower, which would give the Council much needed social housing as well as giving Network Rail and TfL the best chance of improving what was a dangerous and unattractive station.”
    Minutes, 4 Dec 2025, 389 Chiswick High Road, Chiswick, London
  • Raised concerns about neighbours' amenity
    “Cllr John Stroud-Turp echoed concerns about possible effects of noise on residents, particularly during the evening/night, but advised that the current Application has been sent back several times and the Applicant had made efforts to meet standards.”
    Minutes, 6 Nov 2025, 299-303, Chiswick High Road, Chiswick
  • Moved approval
    “Cllr John Stroud-Turp moved approval of the officer’s recommendations, seconded by Cllr Tom Bruce.”
    Minutes, 6 Nov 2025, 299-303, Chiswick High Road, Chiswick
  • Spoke on parking
    “Cllr John Stroud-Turp considered 67 parking spaces to be excessive.”
    Minutes, 7 Aug 2025, 1 Burlington Lane, Chiswick
  • Seconded
    “He saw no planning reasons to refuse and moved to approve the officer’s recommendations, seconded by Cllr John Stroud-Turp.”
    Minutes, 7 Aug 2025, Land at Gunnersbury Park, Popes Lane, Ealing, London
  • Seconded
    “Cllr Bowring moved approval of the officer’s recommendations for item 6, seconded by Cllr John Stroud-Turp.”
    Minutes, 7 Aug 2025, Rivers Academy Tachbrook Road, Feltham
  • Seconded
    “Cllr Bowring moved approval of the officer’s recommendations for item 7, seconded by Cllr John Stroud-Turp.”
    Minutes, 7 Aug 2025, Rivers Academy Tachbrook Road, Feltham

How this is worked out

Everything here is read from Hounslow’s published planning committee minutes, 10 meetings from June 2025 to September 2026. A councillor is matched across meetings by the council’s own member number where it has one, otherwise by full name.

Each vote shows how it is known. Named in the minutes: the minutes, or the council’s own recorded vote, list each member with their vote. From the count and the names: the minutes give the numbers and name the members in the minority, and every member present is known. All members present in favour: the minutes say every member voted for it and the members present are known. No vote against recorded: the minutes record the decision with no vote against, no abstention and no count, at a council whose minutes print a divided vote when there is one, so each member present is counted for. Unanimous vote: the minutes call the decision unanimous, or give a count with no one against and no one abstaining, and each member present is counted for. From the meeting recording: the vote was heard on the council’s recording of the meeting and closes exactly with the members present. Where none of these holds, the vote is left as “Not recorded” and is not counted.

Votes are on the resolution the committee passed, so a vote for is a vote with the majority. A vote is a decision on the application in front of the committee, not a statement of the councillor’s views. A percentage is shown only with five or more votes, decisions or meetings behind it.

Source: Plota analysis of the council’s minutes. The party is from the council’s own list of councillors.

Also on this committee

All Hounslow committee councillors