Short-term let at 32A Duddingston Park, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 27 May 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought retrospective permission to change a two-bedroom property from residential use to a short-term let, without physical alterations.
“The change of use of this property to a short-term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”
“The application is for a change of use from residential to short term let. No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The short-term let use has been operating since December 2006 therefore the application is retrospective.”
Officer report
The site
The property is a two-storey cottage in the garden of the main residence, with its own entrance, rear garden and shared parking access.
“The application property is a two-bedroom, two-storey cottage within the garden ground of the main residence (no.32) at 32A Duddingston Park. The property has its own main door access and there is a private garden to the rear. In front of the property is a surfaced parking area for cars also used by no.32. The vehicular entrance on to Duddingston Park is shared with no. 32.”
“The application property is in an entirely residential area comprising two storey semi- detached and detached villas on the same side of Duddingston Park and detached bungalows on the opposite side.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
Earlier applications for short-term let use were refused, and the Local Review Body upheld the refusal of one application.
“24/03624/FULSTL 32A Duddingston Park Edinburgh EH15 1JU Change of use from residential to Short Term Let (in retrospect). Refused 18 September 2024”
“02.04.2025 Local Review Body Decision- Uphold (application refused).”
Officer report
Main planning concerns
Visitors’ regular arrivals, servicing and activity could disturb neighbours, while the claimed economic benefits did not justify losing residential accommodation.
“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”
“Given the declared housing emergency and pressures on residential accommodation in Edinburgh, in addition to the economic and societal benefits that residential accommodation in the City brings in terms of people being able to live, work and contribute to their community, significant weight has to be given to the retention of existing residential accommodation.”
Officer report
Public representations
Thirty-two representations supported the application, citing economic benefits, no negative effect on residential amenity and off-road parking.
“A total of 32 representations have been received. Although the portal indicates these are 31 comments in support and one objection, the objection is an additional comment in support.”
“- Brings economic benefits. - There will be no negative impact on residential amenity. - Provides off-road parking.”
Officer report
The decision
Planning permission was refused for the reasons set out in the officer report.
“25/04049/FULSTL - Report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer.”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Hal OslerChairLib DemFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Max MitchellVice-ChairConservativeFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Chas BoothGreenFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Christopher CowdyConservativeFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Joan GriffithsLabourFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- David KeySNPFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Euan DavidsonLib DemFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Martha Mattos CoelhoSNPFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Amy McNeese-MechanSNPFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Tim PogsonLabourFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
- Alex StaniforthGreenFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
The minutes record this decision with no vote against, so each member present for this item is shown as voting for it.
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 27 May 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 27 May 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Councillors
- 11SNP 3Conservative 2Green 2Labour 2Lib Dem 2Show votes
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
251 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.