142 ASH COTTAGE, LOWER ROAD, GREAT BOOKHAM, KT23 4AN Data via plota.co.uk
Description
Cherry(T1) Reduce by up to 2 metres back from the height to suitable growth points and up to 1.5 metres from the lateral limbs. Sycamore x 2 (T2 & 3) remove the lowest limb of each tree over the neighbours drive. Data via plota.co.uk
Work with planning data? Every application in Mole Valley - and every UK council - as a live feed or API. About Plota's data service
Other new applications on this street
257, LOWER ROAD, LITTLE BOOKHAM, KT23 4DX
To section fell a large diseased Ash Tree to 3.5 metres high leaving three forks...
FORMER BOOKHAM YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTRE, 164 LOWER ROAD, GREAT BOOKHAM, KT23 4AQ
Construction of a new community centre, Multi-Use Games Area (MUGA), external li...
FORMER BOOKHAM YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTRE, LOWER ROAD, GREAT BOOKHAM, KT23 4AQ
Details of vehicle charging points, cycle facilities and a landscaping scheme su...
220 LOWER ROAD, BOOKHAM, KT23 4DE
Demolition of existing car port and conservatory. Erection of two storey rear ex...
Nearby new applications
10 PINE DEAN, GREAT BOOKHAM, KT23 4BT
Erection of first floor front and side extension.
FORMER BOOKHAM YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTRE, 164 LOWER ROAD, GREAT BOOKHAM, KT23 4AQ
Construction of a new community centre, Multi-Use Games Area (MUGA), external li...
98 LOWER ROAD, FETCHAM, KT22 9NG
Part conversion of garage to habitable accommodation and installation of doors a...
56 EASTWICK DRIVE, GREAT BOOKHAM, KT23 3PS
Demolition of existing dwelling and erection of 1 No. dwellings.
8, KESWICK ROAD, FETCHAM, KT22 9HH
T1- Sycamore - Reduce crown radially back to the most recent pruning points by r...
FORMER BOOKHAM YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTRE, 164 LOWER ROAD, GREAT BOOKHAM, KT23 4AQ
Details of a Construction Environmental Management Plan submitted pursuant to Co...
Mole Valley is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #240 out of 296. Mole Valley is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 76% approved vs 90% nationally.
Referenced application