Casa Ann Old Studley Arms Water End Road Studley Green Buckinghamshire HP14 3XN Data via plota.co.uk

PL/26/02384/TP - Works to trees covered by TPO Refused

Proposal

1x Multi Stem Mature Ash - Dismantle as hazardous Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.

View original council record ↗Last checked 16 Sept 2026, 02:58

Street View

Application progress

✓

Received

24 Mar 2026

✓

Consultation

27 Apr 2026

✗

Refused

29 May 2026

Appeal

Not lodged

Refused on 29 May 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 16 Sept 2026

Documents 2

Decision & officer reports 2

PDF CASE OFFICER REPORT DELEGATED Case Officer Report · 29 May 2026 View ↗ PDF DECISION Decision Notice · 29 May 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 8

Green belt: London

Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.

Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.

Read the government guidance ↗

Chilterns National Landscape

Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.

Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.

Article 4 direction

Former Wycombe Rural District - Poultry Production. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.

An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.

Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2

Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.

Also on the record

Radon affected area, class 2; Tree preservation order 16 m away; Inside the Horsleys Green built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.

Not affected

Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Buckinghamshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Other new applications on this street

1 Oct 2026Pending

Beechcroft Water End Road Beacons Bottom Buckinghamshire HP14 3XF

Householder application for the construction of a single storey side/rear extens...

PL/26/07937/FA

16 Jul 2026Pending

Esterllita Green End Road Radnage Buckinghamshire HP14 4BY

Certificate of lawfulness for proposed 2 x detached buildings to provide a home ...

PL/26/05697/SA

6 May 2026Refused

Church Stile Town End Road Radnage Buckinghamshire HP14 4DY

Alterations comprising two-storey and single-storey extensions, fenestration alt...

PL/26/03753/FA

1 May 2026Refused

The Mead Green End Road Radnage Buckinghamshire HP14 4BZ

Outline planning application for erection of two dwellings within curtilage of T...

PL/26/03567/OA

Nearby new applications

1 Oct 2026Pending

Beechcroft Water End Road Beacons Bottom Buckinghamshire HP14 3XF

Householder application for the construction of a single storey side/rear extens...

PL/26/07937/FA

Important details

Council: Buckinghamshire
Application type: Works to trees covered by TPO
Postcode: HP14 3XN
Received: 24 Mar 2026
Validated: 24 Mar 2026
Ward: Ridgeway West
Parish: Stokenchurch
Case officer: Show
Target decision: 19 May 2026
Decision: Refused
Decision date: 29 May 2026
Decision level: Delegated Decision
Applicant: Show
Agent: Chiltern Hills Arboriculture

How this decision compares

Decided in 66 days from validation, 24 days slower than Buckinghamshire's median of 42 for tree and landscaping works. Refused, as 9% of tree and landscaping works here are.

This one66d

Council42d

UK36d

81%decided within 8 weeks

91%approved

928decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Buckinghamshire in the last twelve months, from validation. Buckinghamshire decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 16 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation: 27 Apr 2026
Comments by: 18 May 2026
Statutory expiry: 19 May 2026
Env. assessment: No

Buckinghamshire

Planning Authority Score

1.3/10

Poor

#284 of 296 councils

Relevant to this application:

Householder decisions

Buckinghamshire is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #280 out of 296. 55% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (86%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England

for householder decisions

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance

Buckinghamshire decision statistics

Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026

84%

Overall approval rate

Below avg (87%) #217 of 296

86%

Householder approved

Below avg (90%) #241 of 296

34%

Decided in 8 weeks

Below avg (63%) #280 of 296

55%

Extended time limit

Above avg (41%) #248 of 296

76%

Minor dwellings approved

491 decided (1-9 homes)

82%

Major dwellings approved

71 decided (10+ homes)

82%

Change of use approved

131 decided

4,446

Total decisions

690 refused in the year to March 2026