48-110 Providence Square London Southwark SE1 2EB Data via plota.co.uk

26/AP/2698 - Works to a Tree in a Conservation Area Approved

Proposal

T14 Silver Birch - cut back to give 1 meter clearance from property. T9 Hawthorn - 1 meter reduction all over and cut back to provide clearance to property. G7 x6 Silver Birch - cut back lateral growth to provide 1 meter clearance from property. T5 Multi-stem silver Birch - fell to ground level and grind stump. T1 Silver Birch - reduce crown by 1-2 meters taking back to old points, shape to keep a balanced crown. T2 Mimosa - reduce height by 2 meters, reduce lateral growth accordingly to retain balance. T4 Catalpa - reduce height by 1 meter and lateral growth by 0.5 meters to shape. G3 x5 Silver Birch - reduce height by 1 meter and lateral to maintain shape. T12 Silver Birch - Crown reduce by up to 3 m to lower risk of failure in extreme weather. T13 Silver Birch - Crown reduce by up to 3 m to lower risk of failure in extreme weather. Reduce lowest branch back to live growth. T14 Silver Birch - Crown lift to 2.5 m, pruning tertiary/secondary branching only. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
11 Sept 2026
✓
Approved
5 Oct 2026

Approved on 5 Oct 2026 · Delegated Panel - Trees · Last checked 6 Oct 2026

Site constraints 14

Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
St Saviours Dock conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
National infrastructure project: Thames Tideway Tunnel
The site is inside the project boundary. Waste water treatment, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted. Also within 2 km: London Strategic Heat Main Project (at pre-application, 329 m).
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Archaeological priority area: North Southwark and Roman Roads
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Southwark AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Thames Path 18 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site; the route and its margin are protected.
Also on the record
12 listed buildings within 150 m; Wider setting of protected view 4A.1 Primrose Hill summit to St Paul's Cathedral; Radon affected area, class 2; Flood defence 4 m away (wall, designed for a 1 in 1000 year flood); Priority habitat 7 m away: Mudflats; Inside the Southwark built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 3 (moderate), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; Designated open space 4 m away.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI), Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Southwark - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Southwark
Application type
Works to a Tree in a Conservation Area
Postcode
SE16 4US
Received
11 Sept 2026
Validated
11 Sept 2026
Ward
North Bermondsey
Parish
Bermondsey And Rotherhithe
Case officer
Show
Target decision
22 Oct 2026
Decision
Tree Works/Conservation Area - GRANTED
Decision date
5 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated Panel - Trees
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 24 days from validation, 10 days faster than Southwark's median of 34 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 98% of tree and landscaping works here are.

98%decided within 8 weeks
98%approved
401decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Southwark in the last twelve months, from validation. Southwark decision record →

Public comments

1comment received
1 supporting

169 neighbours consulted · Last counted 6 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
22 Oct 2026
Env. assessment
No
Southwark
Planning Authority Score
7/10
Good
#64 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Southwark is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #54 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Southwark decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #93 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #92 of 296
78%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #54 of 296
37%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #122 of 296
92%
Minor dwellings approved
259 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
14 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
38 decided
1,622
Total decisions
132 refused in the year to March 2026