4 and 5 Amblecote Cobham Surrey KT11 2JP Data via plota.co.uk

2026/2158 - Tree Preservation Order Registered

Proposal

Tree Preservation Order EL: - With respect to both of these lime trees (T29 and T30), we are applying for permission to remove epicondral growth, lift the crown to 8 meters from the ground and reduce the crown by 20%. This will increase light and visibility around both trees and reduce the risk of damage to people and property caused by deadwood which falls in windy weather. The final heights of the two trees will be maintained at height of 22 meters (T29) and 23 meters (T30). Please note that applications and for these two trees were granted consent and this application is effectively a resubmission of the same requests.T29 - Lime - Crown lift to 8m and crown reduce radial spread only by up to 2m.Final pruning wounds not to exceed 40mm diameter.T30 - Lime - Crown lift to 8m and crown reduce radial spread only by up to 2m.Final pruning wounds not to exceed 40mm diameter. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
7 Sept 2026
✓
Validated
28 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 23 Nov 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision around 8 Nov 2026, from Elmbridge's recent tree and landscaping works.

Associated applications 3

  • Part of

    Treescouncil archive
    • TreesTree Preservation Order EL:10/04 - With respect to both of these lime trees (T29 and T30), we…This application2026/2158
  • Treescouncil archive

Site constraints 3

Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI about 151 m away: Esher Commons SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Also on the record
Inside the Cobham (Elmbridge) built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Elmbridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Elmbridge
Application type
Tree Preservation Order
Postcode
KT11 2JP
Received
7 Sept 2026
Validated
28 Sept 2026
Ward
Oxshott and Stoke DAbernon Ward

Decision outlook

Day 6 of the 56-day target. Elmbridge usually decides tree and landscaping works by day 41.

Day 650 days to the 56-day target
97%decided within 8 weeks
87%approved
314decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Elmbridge in the last twelve months, from validation. Elmbridge decision record →

Elmbridge
Planning Authority Score
2.6/10
Poor
#247 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Elmbridge ranks #195 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Elmbridge is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 79% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 79% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Elmbridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
77%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #277 of 296
79%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #281 of 296
57%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #195 of 296
44%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #178 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
195 decided (1-9 homes)
60%
Major dwellings approved
15 decided (10+ homes)
72%
Change of use approved
32 decided
1,358
Total decisions
314 refused in the year to March 2026