New House Farm,Beet Lane,The Wash,Chapel-en-le-Frith, Data via plota.co.uk

NP/HPK/0725/0672 - Outline Refused

Proposal

Siting of 3 cabins. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
4 Jul 2025
✓
Validated
21 Aug 2025
✗
Refused
15 Dec 2025
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 15 Dec 2025 · Last checked 15 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Peak District Planning Committee on 5 Dec 2025.

Refused

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised refusal because the cabins were unacceptable in principle and would harm the landscape, heritage assets, biodiversity and drainage.
  • The parish council supported farm diversification but raised concerns about the prominent location, while no public letters had been received.
  • Members voted to refuse, saying the location was wrong and that they lacked enough information about the proposed chalets.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site, officers’ assessment, consultation, public comments, committee discussion, vote and reasons for refusal.

Source: Plota analysis of Peak District's committee minutes of 5 Dec 2025.

Documents 22

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 7

Public footpath about 2 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Wash conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
National park about 6 m away: Peak District
Outside the park; its setting can still be raised.
Landscape, scenic beauty and wildlife carry great weight, and major development is only allowed in exceptional circumstances.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Flood defence about 15 m from the postcode pin (natural high ground, designed for a 1 in 5 year flood).
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 17 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Peak District - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Outline
Received
4 Jul 2025
Validated
21 Aug 2025
Parish
Chinley, Buxworth & Brownside
Case officer
Show
Decision
REFUSED
Decision date
15 Dec 2025
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 116 days from validation, 48 days slower than Peak District's median of 68 for outline applications. Refused, as 41% of outline applications here are.

41%decided within 8 weeks
59%approved
12%go to committee

Plota live figures for outline applications decided across the UK in the last twelve months, from validation; too few recent outline applications in Peak District to go on. Peak District decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
27 Aug 2025
Comments by
12 Dec 2025
Statutory expiry
16 Oct 2025