The Old Rectory The Green Pulham Market Norfolk IP21 4TA Data via plota.co.uk

2025/2060 - Works to TPO trees Approved

Proposal

G1 Fruit Trees- To prune by 0.5m in height and width T1 Cedar - To crown raise to achieve clearance height of 5m above ground level. T2 Oak - To crown reduce from 17m in height to 14.5/14m T3 Yew - To fell and replant. T4 Apple - To crown reduce from 5m tall and 3m wide to 3/3.5m tall and 2.5m wide T5 Yew Hedge - To crown reduce from 18m width and 8/10m height to 6/8m height T6 Holly - To crown reduce from 11m tall and width 8.5m to 8.5m tall and 6m width T7 Yew - To crown raise to achieve clearance height of 1.5m from the ground T8 Laurel - To crown reduce from 9.5m tall and 6m wide to 7.5/8m and width to 4.5/5m. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
8 Jul 2025
✓
Approved
29 Aug 2025

Approved on 29 Aug 2025 · Delegated · Last checked 15 Oct 2026

Site constraints 5

Grade II listed: The Old Rectory
List entry 1155039 · 5 m away · 16 more listed buildings within 150 m (1 Grade I, 15 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 16 with distances
Historic England ↗
Pulham Market Conservation Area conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Also on the record
National infrastructure project 1649 m away: East Pye Solar; Inside the Pulham Market built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 1 November 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Norfolk Broadland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to TPO trees
Postcode
IP21 4TA
Received
8 Jul 2025
Validated
8 Jul 2025
Ward
Beck Vale, Dickleburgh And Scole
Parish
Pulham Market
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Sept 2025
Decision
Approval with Conditions
Decision date
29 Aug 2025
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 52 days from validation, 28 days slower than South Norfolk Broadland's median of 24 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 98% of tree and landscaping works here are.

99%decided within 8 weeks
98%approved
797decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by South Norfolk Broadland in the last twelve months, from validation. South Norfolk Broadland decision record →

Public comments

1comment received
1 supporting

Last counted 15 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
2 Sept 2025
Env. assessment
No
South Norfolk Broadland
Planning Authority Score
5.9/10
Average
#106 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

South Norfolk Broadland ranks #136 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Norfolk Broadland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #50 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #71 of 296
67%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #136 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #161 of 296
82%
Minor dwellings approved
137 decided (1-9 homes)
92%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
33 decided
1,013
Total decisions
67 refused in the year to March 2026