Land At London Road Balderton Data via plota.co.uk

26/00473/FUL - Full Planning Permission Refused

Proposal

Construction and operation of a micro energy storage project. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
27 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
30 Mar 2026
✓
Consultation
25 Jun 2026
✓
Committee
2 Jul 2026
✗
Refused
15 Jul 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 15 Jul 2026 · Planning Committee · Last checked 9 Sept 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Newark and Sherwood Planning Committee on 2 Jul 2026.

Refused unanimously

Against officer advice: officers had recommended approval.

  • Officers advised approval because the small battery project supported low-carbon energy and was not considered harmful to the area, homes, highways or ecology.
  • Objectors and members raised concerns about visual impact, lost green space, noise and fire safety near homes, roads and a supermarket.
  • The committee unanimously refused permission against officers’ advice, citing visual impact and safety.
Read how the committee decided The proposed battery storage project, officers’ assessment, objections, speakers, committee debate, vote and reasons for refusal.

Source: Plota analysis of Newark and Sherwood's committee minutes of 2 Jul 2026.

Documents 53

Consultation & comments 38

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Appeal Correspondence · 2 Sept 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 26 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF BALDERTON PARISH Consultee Comment · 23 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 21 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 17 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 17 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 15 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 14 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 14 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 13 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 8 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 4 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 2 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 2 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 2 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 2 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 1 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 1 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 1 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 1 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 31 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 31 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 31 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 31 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 31 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 31 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 31 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 29 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 29 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 29 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 29 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 29 May 2026 View ↗
PDF JOINT RADIO COMPANY Consultee Comment · 19 May 2026 View ↗ PDF COMMENTS FROM ENV HEALTH Consultee Comment · 13 May 2026 View ↗ PDF NCC HIGHWAYS Consultee Comment · 11 May 2026 View ↗ PDF BALDERTON PARISH Consultee Comment · 24 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF JOINT RADIO COMPANY Consultee Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 3

Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
2 listed buildings within 150 m; Inside the Balderton built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Newark and Sherwood - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Planning Permission
Received
27 Mar 2026
Validated
30 Mar 2026
Ward
Balderton South
Parish
Balderton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
25 May 2026
Decision
Application Refused
Decision date
15 Jul 2026
Decision level
Planning Committee
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 107 days from validation, 50 days slower than Newark and Sherwood's median of 57 for full applications. Refused, as 6% of full applications here are.

48%decided within 8 weeks
94%approved
267decided in the last year

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Newark and Sherwood in the last twelve months, from validation. Newark and Sherwood decision record →

Public comments

4comments received
4 objecting

100% object · above the UK average of 75%

34 neighbours consulted · Last counted 9 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14817472
Consultation
25 Jun 2026
Statutory expiry
25 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Newark and Sherwood
Planning Authority Score
3.9/10
Below average
#198 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Newark and Sherwood is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #241 out of 296. 54% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Newark and Sherwood decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #88 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #55 of 296
50%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #241 of 296
54%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #244 of 296
80%
Minor dwellings approved
110 decided (1-9 homes)
88%
Major dwellings approved
25 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
33 decided
767
Total decisions
63 refused in the year to March 2026