Village Farm Main Street Askham Richard York YO23 3PT Data via plota.co.uk

26/00001/TCA - Trees in Conservation Areas Approved

Proposal

Crown lift 1no. Cedar up to a maximum height of 4.5 metres above ground level - tree in a Conservation Area Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
2 Jan 2026
✓
Approved
17 Feb 2026

Approved on 17 Feb 2026 · Last checked 24 Jul 2026

Site constraints 2

Green belt: York
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a, surveyed
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: Natural England's post-1988 ALC field survey (Leeds). Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 2; the survey is the definitive reading.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Survey report ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in York - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
York
Application type
Trees in Conservation Areas
Postcode
YO23 3PT
Received
2 Jan 2026
Validated
2 Jan 2026
Ward
Rural West York
Parish
Askham Richard Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
13 Feb 2026
Decision
No Objections from LPA
Decision date
17 Feb 2026
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 46 days from validation, 4 days faster than York's median of 50 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 98% of tree and landscaping works here are.

63%decided within 8 weeks
98%approved
224decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by York in the last twelve months, from validation. York decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14546920
Planning Portal ref
PP-14546920
Comments by
23 Jan 2026
Statutory expiry
13 Feb 2026
Env. assessment
No
York
Planning Authority Score
3.7/10
Below average
#213 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

York ranks #156 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (87%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
York decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
82%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #255 of 296
87%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #237 of 296
64%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #156 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #168 of 296
69%
Minor dwellings approved
104 decided (1-9 homes)
71%
Major dwellings approved
17 decided (10+ homes)
63%
Change of use approved
68 decided
1,278
Total decisions
224 refused in the year to March 2026