1 Queens Ride North Baddesley Southampton Hampshire SO52 9JZ Data via plota.co.uk

26/01892/TPOS - TREE WORKS WITHIN TPO - SOUTH Approved

Proposal

T1 - Oak - Crown raise by up to 5m from ground, all round reduction by approx. 2m to old points Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
31 Aug 2026
✓
Validated
1 Sept 2026
✓
Consultation
1 Sept 2026
✓
Approved
7 Oct 2026

Approved on 7 Oct 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 7 Oct 2026

Site constraints 3

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Solent: Includes Chichester and Langstone Harbours SPA/Ramsar, Solent and Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar, Solent Maritime SAC, Portsmouth Harbour SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Also on the record
Inside the North Baddesley built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Test Valley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
TREE WORKS WITHIN TPO - SOUTH
Postcode
SO52 9JZ
Received
31 Aug 2026
Validated
1 Sept 2026
Ward
NORTH BADDESLEY
Parish
NORTH BADDESLEY
Case officer
Show
Target decision
27 Oct 2026
Decision
CONSENT subject to conditions and notes
Decision date
7 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
TreeMenders

How this decision compares

Decided in 36 days from validation, 5 days slower than Test Valley's median of 31 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 95% of tree and landscaping works here are.

97%decided within 8 weeks
95%approved
502decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Test Valley in the last twelve months, from validation. Test Valley decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 7 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15193980
Planning Portal ref
PP-15193980
Consultation
1 Sept 2026
Comments by
22 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
27 Oct 2026
Env. assessment
No
Test Valley
Planning Authority Score
7.8/10
Good
#32 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Test Valley is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #71 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Test Valley decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #68 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #62 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #71 of 296
31%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #61 of 296
70%
Minor dwellings approved
96 decided (1-9 homes)
80%
Major dwellings approved
5 decided (10+ homes)
88%
Change of use approved
50 decided
996
Total decisions
72 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use