Rose Farm,Unnamed Road From Rock Lodge Farm To Priestcliffe Road,Priestcliffe, Data via plota.co.uk

NP/DDD/0626/0627 - Listed Building Consent (alter or extend) Approved

Proposal

Listed Building consent - Internal alterations and structural repairs. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
1 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
28 Sept 2026

Approved on 28 Sept 2026 · Last checked 29 Sept 2026

Documents 22

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 7

Peak District National Park
The park authority decides applications here. Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Landscape, scenic beauty and wildlife carry great weight, and major development is only allowed in exceptional circumstances.
Public footpath about 5 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Priestcliffe conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 6
An estimated 30% or more of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Nature recovery project: Wye Valley.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Building

Floor area93 m² (1,001 sq ft)
Energy ratingC (73 out of 100), could reach B
PropertySemi-detached house, 5 habitable rooms
Built1950 to 1966
HeatingBoiler and radiators, mains gas
WallsCavity wall, filled cavity

From the energy performance certificate lodged in April 2022, the latest held for this property. The building may have changed since. View the certificate

Work with planning data?

Every application in Peak District - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Listed Building Consent (alter or extend)
Postcode
SK17, UK
Received
1 Jul 2026
Validated
1 Jul 2026
Parish
Taddington & Priestcliffe
Case officer
Show
Decision
Granted Conditionally
Decision date
28 Sept 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Jim Mundy / Richard Mundy Building Design Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 89 days from validation, 37 days slower than Peak District's median of 52 for extensions. Approved, as 85% of extensions here are.

74%decided within 8 weeks
85%approved
181decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Peak District in the last twelve months, from validation. Peak District decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
7 Jul 2026
Comments by
7 Aug 2026
Statutory expiry
26 Aug 2026

Energy performance: Energy performance certificates from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright 2026.