Land Between Hill Farm And Copucobana, Halifax Road, Briercliffe, Burnley, Lancashire, BB10 3QS Data via plota.co.uk

FUL/2025/0519 - Full planning permission Refused

Proposal

Stage 2 Technical Details Consent for 1 dwelling with access from Halifax Road (following the grant of Stage 1 Permission in Principle ). Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
10 Sept 2025
✓
Validated
11 Sept 2025
✗
Refused
14 Nov 2025
✗
Appeal dismissed
17 Feb 2026

Refused on 14 Nov 2025 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 11 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Burnley Development Control Committee on 13 Nov 2025.

Refused

  • Officers advised refusal because the kerb buildouts could not be delivered acceptably and would create a highway safety issue.
  • Residents and consultees raised concerns about highway safety, trees, ecology, heritage, flooding and drainage.
  • The committee refused the application because the kerb buildout would narrow the road and harm highway safety.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, objections, highways concerns and committee decision.

Source: Plota analysis of Burnley's committee minutes of 13 Nov 2025.

Documents 61

Statements & assessments 23

PDF Appellant's Response to LPA Statement Appeal Correspondence · 28 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF LCC Highways Appeal Statement Appeal Correspondence · 8 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF LCC Highways Appeal Statement Appeal Correspondence · 8 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF LPA Statement of Case Council's Case · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF LPA Statement of Case Council's Case · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF LPA Statement of Case Council's Case · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF LPA Statement of Case Council's Case · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF LPA Statement of Case Council's Case · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF LPA Statement of Case Council's Case · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF LPA Statement of Case Council's Case · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Appellant's Statement of Case Appellant's Case · 28 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF Appellant's Statement of Case Appellant's Case · 28 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF SPEED SURVEY REPORT AND CALCULATIONS Report · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF ARB SURVEY AND TREE CONSTRAINTS PLAN Report · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF SPEED SURVEY Report · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF DRAINAGE PLAN Drawing · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL Report · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Other · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF TRANSPORT TECHNICAL NOTE FINAL Report · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 2 MAP 1 UK HABITAT SURVEY Report · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF FLOOR RISK ASSESSMENT Report · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF DRAINAGE Drawing · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF TOPO SURVEY PLAN Drawing · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

  • FullRefusedFUL/2025/0519This application
    Stage 2 Technical Details Consent for 1 dwelling with access from Halifax Road (following the grant of Stage 1 Permission…
  • OutlineApprovedcouncil archive

Site constraints 4

Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Burnley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Burnley
Application type
Full planning permission
Postcode
BB10 3QS
Received
10 Sept 2025
Validated
11 Sept 2025
Ward
Briercliffe
Parish
Briercliffe
Case officer
Show
Target decision
6 Nov 2025
Decision
Refuse
Decision date
14 Nov 2025
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Appeal
Dismissed · 17 Feb 2026 · Written Representations · Inspectorate case 6002073 ↗
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 64 days from validation, 9 days slower than Burnley's median of 55 for full applications. Refused, as 18% of full applications here are.

60%decided within 8 weeks
82%approved
10%go to committee

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Burnley in the last twelve months, from validation. Burnley decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 11 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
14 Oct 2025
Burnley
Planning Authority Score
5/10
Average
#145 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Burnley ranks #113 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (90%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Burnley decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
88%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #148 of 296
90%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #187 of 296
71%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #113 of 296
40%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #149 of 296
73%
Minor dwellings approved
30 decided (1-9 homes)
92%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
22 decided
294
Total decisions
36 refused in the year to March 2026