Quay edge railings at Inner Slipway, Military Road, Ramsgate
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Thanet Planning Committee on 17 Dec 2025.
What was proposed
White powder-coated three-bar railings would complete a continuous barrier along the unprotected section of the western pier.
“The proposed development is the erection of white powder coated three bar railings along the remaining unprotected section of the western pier to provide a continuous barrier for pedestrians and vehicles. The proposed railings would be similar in design to the railings approved under applications reference F/TH/17/0964 and L/TH/19/0674.”
Officer report
The harbour and listed structures
The site is within Ramsgate’s Conservation Area and includes listed harbour walls, piers, coping stones and other structures.
“Ramsgate Harbour is the only Royal harbour in the UK, sited within the Ramsgate Conservation Area, and contains numerous listed buildings and structures.”
“The areas subject to this application include part of the Western Pier. The Harbour cross walls, sluices, bollards, dry dock, basin gates, wing wall and Dundee steps are grade II* listed and the Inner basin wall, slipway, steps, West Pier, bollards, iron crane and fairleads are grade II listed. All of these individual listings include the Granite walls with the Granite coping stones that extend around the inner and outer marinas.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
Earlier railing proposals were granted in 2017 and allowed on appeal in 2020 after a 2019 refusal.
“L/TH/19/0674 - Application for Listed Building Consent for the installation of quayside railings. Refused 22 August 2019. Allowed at appeal 01 July 2020”
“F/TH/17/0964. Quay Edge Military Road - Erection of railings to quay edge. Granted 14 December 2017.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because public safety benefits from reducing fall risks were considered to outweigh harm to the heritage assets.
“The design and form of the railings, and the works required for their installation, is considered to result in less than substantial harm to the grade II listed structures, and therefore the NPPF requires that this harm must be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal. When considering the impact of a proposed development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, great weight should be given to the asset's conservation and as heritage assets are irreplaceable, any harm or loss should require clear and convincing justification.”
“The installation of railings around the remaining section of the inner harbour, cross wall and west pier is considered to have a clear public benefit due to the obvious change of character around the harbour, however the design and physical contact of the railings with the Grade II* listed structures does result in harm to the historical and architectural significance of the designated heritage assets.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Historic England offered no advice, while the conservation officer raised no objection and a heritage forum criticised the design and fixing method.
“Historic England - Historic England provides advice when our engagement can add most value. In this case we are not offering advice. This should not be interpreted as comment on the merits of the application. We suggest that you seek the views of your specialist conservation and archaeological advisers.”
“TDC Conservation Officer - NPPF Section 16, Paragraph 210 states, in determining applications, local planning authorities should take account of (a) the desirability of sustaining and enhancing the significance of heritage assets and putting them to viable uses consistent with their conservation as well as (b) the positive contribution that conservation of heritage assets can make to sustainable communities including their economic vitality; and…”
Officer report
The main concerns
Installing the railings would damage historic granite and appear utilitarian, but incidents and increased visitors created a significant safety benefit.
“The Granite coping stones are a key feature of the harbour being located on the edge of the quay and extending around both the inner and outer marinas. This application would require holes to be drilled into the listed granite coping stones to allow for the installation of the railings. The physical incursion into the historic granite coping stones would result in harm to their historic fabric by altering their structure and appearance.”
“Whilst the proposed railings would be similar in appearance to the railings installed as part of the previous applications they are still considered to have a utilitarian appearance that is out of keeping with the historic harbour and its listed features, the proposed railings would therefore detrimentally affect the significance of the designated heritage assets in terms of its visual appearance.”
Officer report
The committee vote
A motion to adopt the officer recommendation was proposed, seconded and carried.
“It was proposed by Councillor Rattigan and seconded by Councillor Britcher:”
“THAT the officer’s recommendation be adopted, namely:”
Minutes
The decision
The application was approved subject to conditions requiring timely works, advance notice and recording, and repair of any damage.
“That the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:”
“1 The works hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission. GROUND; In pursuance of Section 18 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004).”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Helen CrittendenChairLabour
- Pat MakinsonLabour
- Martin BoydLabour
- Mike GarnerGreen
- David GreenLabour
- Jennifer MatterfaceLabour
- Paul MooreConservative
- Jack PackmanLabour
- Marc RattiganConservative
- Rebecca WingGreen
- Leo BritcherSubstituteLabour
- Corinna HuxleySubstituteLabour
Proposed by Councillor Marc Rattigan, seconded by Councillor Leo Britcher.
Also attending Ruth Duckworth Labour, Phil Fellows Conservative, Heather Keen Labour
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Thanet Planning Committee minutes, 17 December 2025
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Thanet's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Thanet Planning Committee
- Council
- Thanet
- Date
- Wednesday 17 December 2025
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 12Labour 8Conservative 2Green 2Show councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Thanet committee decisions →
This committee's year
48 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.