Patshull Park And Parkland Patshull Park Burnhill Green WOLVERHAMPTON WV6 7HR Data via plota.co.uk

26/00623/TTREE - Works to trees TPO Awaiting decision
Trees & landscaping

Proposal

TPO No. : Lime (T8) - reduce height to 8 metres. Lime (T11) - dismantle and remove. Horse chestnut (T21) - crown reduce by up to 3 metres. Lime (T27) - dismantle and remove. Red Oak (T28) - crown reduce by up to 3 metres. Lime (T34) - dismantle and remove. Lime (T35) - dismantle and remove. Horse chestnut (T47) - dismantle and remove. Sweet chestnut (T55) - reduce dead stem by up to 4 metres. Lime (T57) - reduce to height of epicormic growth. Lime (T64) - reduce to height of epicormic growth. Lime (T66) - reduce to height of epicormic growth. Lime (T70) - dismantle and remove. Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
21 Jul 2026
✓
Consultation
28 Jul 2026
Decision
Expected by 15 Sept 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 9 Oct 2026; it is now day 80.

The consultation period closed on 11 Aug 2026.

Documents 3

Plans & drawings 2

PDF LOCATION PLAN Location Plan · 28 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF 26_00446_TTREE-TREESAFETY_REPORT_-_PATSHULL-955738 Plans and Drawings · 21 Jul 2026 View ↗

Application forms 1

PDF APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED Application Form (Redacted) · 21 Jul 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

Green belt: Birmingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Registered park or garden: Patshull Hall
Nationally designated heritage. Its significance and setting carry great weight.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
2 listed buildings within 150 m
Nearest: The Temple, Grade II*, 15 m away · 1 Grade II*, 1 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 2 with distances
Historic England ↗
Habitat network: Wood pasture and parkland
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Staffordshire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Other new applications on this street

8 Sept 2026Pending

The Butlers House Patshull Park Burnhill Green WOLVERHAMPTON WV6 7HY

TPO No. 146/1995: T118, Walnut - reduce lateral branch extending over the neighb...

26/00768/TTREE
11 May 2026Approved

Burnhill Green Farmhouse Burnhill Green Road Burnhill Green WOLVERHAMPTON WV6 7JG

External alterations to existing buildings

26/00418/FUL
5 May 2026Approved

The Bothy Patshull Park Burnhill Green WOLVERHAMPTON WV6 7HY

Lawful Development Certificate that the operational development on site constitu...

26/00402/LUE
24 Apr 2026Approved

Cottage The Grange Patshull Park Burnhill Green WOLVERHAMPTON WV6 7HY

Re-stoning and extension of driveway

26/00335/LUP

Important details

Council
South Staffordshire
Application type
Works to trees TPO
Postcode
WV6 7HR
Received
21 Jul 2026
Validated
21 Jul 2026
Ward
Pattingham, Trysull, Bobb & L Penn
Parish
PATTINGHAM & PATSHULL
Case officer
Show
Target decision
15 Sept 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Morfe Valley Arboriculture

Decision outlook

Day 80, past the statutory target. 87% of tree and landscaping works in South Staffordshire are decided within thirteen weeks, which runs to 20 Oct 2026; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 7 Oct 2026.

Day 8024 days past the 56-day target
65%decided within 8 weeks
92%approved
104decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by South Staffordshire in the last twelve months, from validation. South Staffordshire decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 7 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15099735
Planning Portal ref
PP-15099735
Consultation
28 Jul 2026
Comments by
11 Aug 2026
Statutory expiry
15 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No

Historical activity at this location

2 previous applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.

This property

Previous applications at this address

2025 Approved
TPO No. 146/1995: All Limes as specified in application - remove basal and epicormic grow…
25/00998/TTREE
2025 Approved
TPO No. 146/1995: All Limes as specified in application - remove basal and epicormic grow…
25/00998/TTREE
South Staffordshire
Planning Authority Score
3.5/10
Below average
#220 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

South Staffordshire ranks #179 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 49% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Staffordshire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
85%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #211 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #180 of 296
61%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #179 of 296
49%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #222 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
75 decided (1-9 homes)
88%
Major dwellings approved
8 decided (10+ homes)
87%
Change of use approved
23 decided
612
Total decisions
89 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings