The Limes The Fosse Cropwell Butler Nottinghamshire NG12 3AQ Data via plota.co.uk

26/00301/FUL - Full Application Pending Decision

Proposal

Retrospective farm shop building built on existing concrete yard Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
13 Feb 2026
✓
Validated
1 Oct 2026
✓
Consultation
6 Oct 2026
Decision
Expected by 26 Nov 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision between 26 Nov 2026 and 25 Dec 2026, from Rushcliffe's recent commercial premises.

Comments are open until 27 Oct 2026

Comment on this application ↗

Site constraints 4

Green belt: Derby and Nottingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Building

Floor area81 m² (872 sq ft)
Energy ratingE (46 out of 100), could reach B
PropertyDetached house, 3 habitable rooms
Built1930 to 1949
HeatingBoiler and radiators, electric
WallsSolid brick, with internal insulation

From the energy performance certificate lodged in March 2025, the latest held for this property. The building may have changed since. View the certificate

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rushcliffe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rushcliffe
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
NG12 3AQ
Received
13 Feb 2026
Validated
1 Oct 2026
Ward
Cropwell
Parish
Cropwell Butler
Case officer
Show
Target decision
26 Nov 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 8 of the 56-day target. Rushcliffe usually decides commercial premises by day 75.

Day 867 days to the predicted decision (day 75)
46%decided within 8 weeks
89%approved
40decided in the last year

Plota live figures for commercial premises decided by Rushcliffe in the last twelve months, from validation. Rushcliffe decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 6 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
6 Oct 2026
Comments by
27 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry
26 Nov 2026
Env. assessment
No
Rushcliffe
Planning Authority Score
3.8/10
Below average
#208 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rushcliffe is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #233 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rushcliffe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #91 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #89 of 296
51%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #233 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #227 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
13 decided
761
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026

Energy performance: Energy performance certificates from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright 2026.