Aldridge Outwood Lane Chipstead Surrey CR5 3NG Data via plota.co.uk

26/00993/F - Full planning Refused

Proposal

Replacement dwellinghouse and associated external works Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
16 Jul 2026
Consultation
24 Jul 2026
Refused
7 Sept 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 7 Sept 2026 · Neighbourhood Development Manager · Last checked 7 Sept 2026

Site constraints 8

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Local nature reserve 47 m away: Banstead Woods and Chipstead Downs
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI 167 m away: Chipstead Downs SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Also on the record
2 listed buildings within 150 m; Priority habitat 33 m away: Lowland calcareous grassland; Open access land 49 m away: Access Land - Combined Open Country, Registered Common Land and Section 16 Dedicated Land. MoD Byelaw, Section 28 Exclusions, Racecourses and Aerodromes and ECP Margin have been removed..
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Reigate - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Reigate
Application type
Full planning
Postcode
CR5 3NG
Received
16 Jul 2026
Validated
16 Jul 2026
Ward
Chipstead, Kingswood And Woodmansterne
Case officer
Show
Target decision
10 Sept 2026
Decision
Refused
Decision date
7 Sept 2026
Decision level
Neighbourhood Development Manager
Applicant
Show
Agent
A Plus K Architecture

How this decision compares

Decided in 53 days from validation, about the council's usual 56 days. Refused, as 8% of demolitions here are.

74%decided within 8 weeks
92%approved
136decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by Reigate in the last twelve months, from validation. Reigate decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

2 neighbours consulted · Last counted 7 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14992048
Neighbours
21 Jul 2026
Consultation
24 Jul 2026
Comments by
20 Aug 2026
Site or press notice
30 Jul 2026
Statutory expiry
10 Sept 2026
Reigate
Planning Authority Score
7.3/10
Good
#52 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Reigate is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #70 out of 296. Only 26% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Reigate decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
88%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #160 of 296
93%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #135 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #70 of 296
26%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #35 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
110 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
10 decided (10+ homes)
74%
Change of use approved
31 decided
981
Total decisions
116 refused in the year to March 2026