Earnsdale Vale Lane Lathom Ormskirk Lancashire L40 6JH Data via plota.co.uk

2026/0182/PIP - Permission in Principle Refused

Proposal

Application for Permission in Principle - The erection of three new build dwellings. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
9 Mar 2026
✓
Consultation
10 Mar 2026
✗
Refused
21 May 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 21 May 2026 · Delegated unless Member request to Cttee · Last checked 8 Sept 2026

Documents 21

Consultation & comments 14

PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 3 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 28 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 27 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 16 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Environmental protection response Consultation response · 7 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 1 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 1 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 29 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF United utilities Consultation response · 26 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Coal authority Consultation response · 25 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Highways Consultation response (LCC) · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 22 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Neighbour & Interested Party Representation · 13 Mar 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

Green belt: Merseyside and Greater Manchester
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Coal mining development high risk area
Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment. Nearest recorded adit: 25 m away (reference 347407-024).
From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.
Coal mining risk assessments ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 3; Inside the Skelmersdale built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 1, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 1

Last sold for £357,000 in August 2013. Detached house, freehold.

30 August 2013£357,000

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Building

Floor area154 m² (1,658 sq ft)
Energy ratingD (66 out of 100), could reach B
PropertySemi-detached house, 6 habitable rooms
Built1930 to 1949
HeatingBoiler and radiators, oil
WallsCavity wall, as built, insulated (assumed)

From the energy performance certificate lodged in January 2013, the latest held for this property. The building may have changed since. View the certificate

Work with planning data?

Every application in West Lancashire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Permission in Principle
Postcode
L40 6JH
Received
9 Mar 2026
Validated
9 Mar 2026
Ward
Rural South Ward
Parish
Lathom South
Case officer
Show
Decision
Permission in Principle Refused
Decision date
21 May 2026
Decision level
Delegated unless Member request to Cttee
Applicant
Show
Agent
Planning Potential

How this decision compares

Decided in 73 days from validation, 18 days slower than West Lancashire's median of 55 for new homes. Refused, as 45% of new homes here are.

62%decided within 8 weeks
55%approved
36decided in the last year

Plota live figures for new homes decided by West Lancashire in the last twelve months, from validation. West Lancashire decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

2 neighbours consulted · Last counted 8 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
10 Mar 2026
Consultation
10 Mar 2026
Comments by
2 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
West Lancashire
Planning Authority Score
1.1/10
Poor
#291 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

West Lancashire is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #265 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 60% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. West Lancashire is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 85% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 85% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
West Lancashire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
82%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #253 of 296
85%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #252 of 296
41%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #265 of 296
60%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #271 of 296
73%
Minor dwellings approved
62 decided (1-9 homes)
60%
Major dwellings approved
5 decided (10+ homes)
59%
Change of use approved
34 decided
564
Total decisions
103 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Energy performance: Energy performance certificates from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright 2026.