55 - 57 High Street Feckenham Worcestershire B96 6HU Data via plota.co.uk

26/00532/LBC - Listed Building Consent Approved

Proposal

Removal of Alkyd paint systems. Repairs to east elevation timber frame. Replacement of brick infil with lightweight insulated lime plaster panels. Replacement of doors and windows. Replacement of the internal subfloor and internal lime plastering. New bathroom and cloak room fitted. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
6 May 2026
✓
Consultation
19 May 2026
✓
Approved
1 Jul 2026

Approved on 1 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 3 Aug 2026

Documents 22

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 9

Grade II listed: 55 and 57, High Street
List entry 1166845 · 3 m away · 11 more listed buildings within 150 m (1 Grade II*, 10 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 11 with distances
Historic England ↗
Green belt: Birmingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Scheduled monument 60 m away: Churchyard cross in St John the Baptist's churchyard
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Nationally important archaeology protected by the Secretary of State. Work that affects the monument or its setting is rarely permitted.
Historic England ↗
Public footpath 24 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 4; National infrastructure project 633 m away: Arrow Valley Solar, at pre-application; Inside the Feckenham built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redditch - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Redditch
Application type
Listed Building Consent
Postcode
B96 6HU
Received
6 May 2026
Validated
6 May 2026
Ward
Astwood Bank And Feckenham Ward
Parish
Feckenham Parish
Case officer
Show
Target decision
1 Jul 2026
Decision
Listed Building Consent Granted
Decision date
1 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Wigornia

How this decision compares

Decided in 56 days from validation, 7 days slower than Redditch's median of 49 for extensions. Approved, as 99% of extensions here are.

73%decided within 8 weeks
99%approved
103decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Redditch in the last twelve months, from validation. Redditch decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 3 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14142706
Planning Portal ref
PP-14142706
Comments by
12 Jun 2026
Site or press notice
19 May 2026
Statutory expiry
1 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Redditch
Planning Authority Score
8.7/10
Excellent
#12 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Redditch is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #69 out of 296. Only 24% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 98% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
98% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redditch decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #25 of 296
98%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #22 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #69 of 296
24%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #27 of 296
90%
Minor dwellings approved
10 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
6 decided (10+ homes)
75%
Change of use approved
4 decided
160
Total decisions
8 refused in the year to March 2026