St John The Baptist Church The Square Feckenham Worcestershire B96 6HR Data via plota.co.uk

26/01049/FUL - Full Application Pending Consideration

Proposal

Re-roofing and proposed change of roofing material to the north aisle and below ground rainwater drainage works. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
9 Sept 2026
✓
Consultation
1 Oct 2026
Decision
Expected by 4 Nov 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision around 31 Oct 2026, from Redditch's recent extensions.

Comments are open until 30 Oct 2026

Comment on this application ↗

Site constraints 10

Grade II* listed: Church of St John the Baptist
List entry 1167686 · 2 m away · 19 more listed buildings within 150 m (19 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 19 with distances
Historic England ↗
Green belt: Birmingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Public footpath 13 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Scheduled monument 25 m away: Churchyard cross in St John the Baptist's churchyard
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Nationally important archaeology protected by the Secretary of State. Work that affects the monument or its setting is rarely permitted.
Historic England ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 4; National infrastructure project 675 m away: Arrow Valley Solar, at pre-application; Inside the Feckenham built-up area; Heritage at risk 94 m away: Feckenham manorial moated site; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redditch - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Redditch
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
B96 6HY
Received
9 Sept 2026
Validated
9 Sept 2026
Ward
Astwood Bank And Feckenham Ward
Parish
Feckenham Parish
Case officer
Show
Target decision
4 Nov 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Nick Joyce Architects

Decision outlook

Day 30 of the 56-day target. Redditch usually decides extensions by day 49.

Day 3026 days to the 56-day target
73%decided within 8 weeks
99%approved
103decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Redditch in the last twelve months, from validation. Redditch decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 7 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15211152
Planning Portal ref
PP-15211152
Consultation
1 Oct 2026
Comments by
30 Oct 2026
Site or press notice
2 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry
4 Nov 2026
Env. assessment
No
Redditch
Planning Authority Score
8.7/10
Excellent
#12 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Redditch is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #69 out of 296. Only 24% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 98% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
98% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redditch decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #25 of 296
98%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #22 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #69 of 296
24%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #27 of 296
90%
Minor dwellings approved
10 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
6 decided (10+ homes)
75%
Change of use approved
4 decided
160
Total decisions
8 refused in the year to March 2026