Land East Of Karslake China Clay Works Currian Vale Nanpean Cornwall PL26 7XS Data via plota.co.uk

PA25/09509 - Full application Approved

Proposal

Two wind turbines along with associated works, equipment and necessary infrastructure including access tracks, crane pads, cabling, electrical housing and a temporary construction compound Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Consultation
20 Feb 2025
✓
Received
around 16 Feb 2026
✓
Approved
15 Jul 2026

Approved on 15 Jul 2026 · HoS Sign Off · Last checked 25 Sept 2026

Documents 71

Statements & assessments 61

PDF LEMP Assessment - Ecological · 2 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF ECOLOGY Consultee Comment · 22 May 2026 View ↗ PDF BIRD SURVEY REPORT APPENDIX Assessment - Ecological · 5 May 2026 View ↗ PDF LANDSCAPE AND ECOLOGY MANAGEMENT PLAN Assessment - Landscape · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF BIRD SURVEY REPORT Assessment - Ecological · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF BIODIVERSITY METRIC Biodiversity Net Gain · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN STRATEGY Biodiversity Net Gain · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Assessment - Ecological · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF J-4142 3001 REV C SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE LAYOUT Plan - Drainage · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ECOLOGY Consultee Comment · 25 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT (INCL. DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT) Statement - Environmental Impact · 13 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX A EIA SCREENING STATEMENT Statement - Environmental Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 01 LOCATION PLAN Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 02 SITE ANALYSIS Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 03 CUMULATIVE WIND ENERGY SCHEMES Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 04 LANDSCAPE RELEVANT DESIGNATIONS Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 05 NATIONAL LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 06 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 07 PRINCIPAL VISUAL AMENITY RECEPTORS Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 08 ZTV TO HUB (20KM) Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 09 ZTV TO TIP (20KM) Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 10 ZTV TO HUB (10KM) Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 11 ZTV TO TIP (10KM) Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 12A-D VIEWPOINT 01 - FROM ST DENNIS CHURCH Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 13A-D VIEWPOINT 02 - FROM ROCHE ROCK Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 14A-D VIEWPOINT 03 - FROM ST STEPHEN?S BEACON OPEN ACCESS AREA Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 15A-D VIEWPOINT 04 - FROM HENSBARROW BEACON OPEN ACCESS AREA, Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 16A-D VIEWPOINT 05 - FROM PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY ON FRINGES OF NANPEAN Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 17A-C VIEWPOINT 06 - FROM OLD POUND ROAD Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 18A-C VIEWPOINT 07 - FROM WATER HILL MINOR ROAD Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 19A-C VIEWPOINT 08 - FROM OLD POUND ROAD Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 20A-C VIEWPOINT 09 - FROM NEW HOUSING ESTATE ON FRINGES OF GOVERSETH/FOXHOLE Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 21A-D VIEWPOINT 10 - FROM CURRIAN HILL MINOR ROAD, ON FRINGES OF NANPEAN Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 22A-D VIEWPOINT 11 - FROM GREENSPLAT ROAD, TO THE SOUTH OF GREYSTONES & SOUTH COTTAGE Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 23A-C VIEWPOINT 12 - FROM NATIONAL CYCLE ROUTE 305 MINOR ROAD CROSSING GOSS MOOR Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 24A-D VIEWPOINT 13 - FROM CHAPEL HILL MINOR ROAD, TO THE EAST OF STICKER Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 25A-D VIEWPOINT 14 - FROM CASTLE-AN-DINAS OPEN ACCESS AREA Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 26A-D VIEWPOINT 15 - FROM PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, IN CORNWALL NATIONAL LANDSCAPE Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 27A-D VIEWPOINT 16 - FROM PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, INNIS DOWNS Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 28A-D VIEWPOINT 17 - FROM HELMAN TOR OPEN ACCESS AREA HELMAN TOR & LUXULYAN VALLEY Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 29A-D VIEWPOINT 18 - FROM CEMETERY ADJACENT TO ST STEPHEN CHURCH Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D - FIG 30A-C VIEWPOINT 19 - FROM THE HEATHERS, GREYSTONES CARAVAN PARK Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX D LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Assessment - Visual Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX E BAT SURVEYS Bat and Barn Owl Survey · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX E GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE STATEMENT Statement - Environmental Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX E PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL -DUBBERS TWO TURBINES SITE Assessment - Ecological · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX E TREE CANOPY STATEMENT Tree Survey/Report · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX G OPERATIONAL NOISE REPORT Assessment - Noise Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX H FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT (J-4142 -REV 3) Assessment - Flood Risk · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX I EMAIL - ATKINS RESPONSE 16/10/2025 Statement - Environmental Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX I EMAIL - JRC RESPONSE 16/10/2025 Statement - Environmental Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX J SHADOW FLICKER ASSESSMENT Statement - Environmental Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX K CONSTRUCTION TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT PLAN Assessment - Transport · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX K ROUTE SURVEY REPORT - ABNORMAL INDIVISIBLE LOAD ROUTE SURVEY IMERYS WIND FARM Assessment - Transport · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX K ROUTE SURVEY REPORT - ABNORMAL INDIVISIBLE LOAD ROUTE SURVEY HIGHER BISCOVILLACK Assessment - Transport · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Statement - Community Involvement · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF APENDIX M - AVIATION SUPPORTING STATEMENT Statement - Environmental Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX N PHASE 1 PRELIMINARY RISK ASSESSMENT Assessment - Land Contamination · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX O COLLABORATIVE BENEFITS REPORT Statement - Environmental Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF ECOLOGY REPORT TRIGGER TABLE Ecology Report Trigger Table · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY (NTS) Statement - Environmental Impact · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗

Consultation & comments 5

PDF LANDSCAPE OFFICER Consultee Comment · 16 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations Received · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations Received · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations Received · 19 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations Received · 19 Feb 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 7

Agricultural land, grade 5
Very poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Bible Christian Chapel With Attached Sunday School, Grade II, about 54 m from the postcode pin
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Nature recovery project: G7 Legacy; National infrastructure project about 1471 m away: The Trelavour Lithium Project, at pre-application; Priority habitat about 38 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Cornwall - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Cornwall
Application type
Full application
Postcode
PL26 7XS
Received
around 16 Feb 2026
Validated
16 Feb 2026
Ward
Roche And Bugle
Parish
St. Stephen-in-Brannel
Case officer
Show
Target decision
8 Jun 2026
Decision
Approved with conditions
Decision date
15 Jul 2026
Decision level
HoS Sign Off
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 149 days from validation, 94 days slower than Cornwall's median of 55 for utility and infrastructure works. Approved, as 98% of utility and infrastructure works here are.

66%decided within 8 weeks
98%approved
343decided in the last year

Plota live figures for utility and infrastructure works decided by Cornwall in the last twelve months, from validation. Cornwall decision record →

Public comments

1comment received
1 objecting

Last counted 25 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14554923
Planning Portal ref
PP-14554923
Site or press notice
20 Feb 2025
Statutory expiry
8 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
Yes
Cornwall
Planning Authority Score
7.9/10
Good
#28 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Cornwall is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #64 out of 296. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Cornwall decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #79 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #28 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #64 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #101 of 296
82%
Minor dwellings approved
1180 decided (1-9 homes)
94%
Major dwellings approved
67 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
194 decided
4,839
Total decisions
363 refused in the year to March 2026