All Saints Church, Derby Road, Risley Data via plota.co.uk

PA/2026/0582 - Consent under Tree Preservation Orders Under Consideration

Proposal

Works to a protected Yew Tree: Crown lift to 3 metres and branch trim by 1 metre to clear roof. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
22 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 17 Nov 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicts a decision around 29 Oct 2026, from Erewash's recent tree and landscaping works.

Site constraints 5

12 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Church of All Saints, Grade II*, about 3 m from the postcode pin · 4 Grade II*, 8 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 12 with distances
Historic England ↗
Green belt: Derby and Nottingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Risley conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Inside the Risley built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Erewash - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Erewash
Application type
Consent under Tree Preservation Orders
Postcode
DE72 3SU
Received
22 Sept 2026
Validated
22 Sept 2026
Ward
Little Hallam (Historical);Draycott (Historical)
Parish
Risley
Target decision
17 Nov 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 17 of the 56-day target. Erewash usually decides tree and landscaping works by day 37.

Day 1739 days to the 56-day target
97%decided within 8 weeks
94%approved
72decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Erewash in the last twelve months, from validation. Erewash decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 2 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Erewash
Planning Authority Score
7.4/10
Good
#48 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Erewash ranks #161 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Only 28% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Erewash decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #54 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #31 of 296
62%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #161 of 296
28%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #44 of 296
83%
Minor dwellings approved
53 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
8 decided (10+ homes)
76%
Change of use approved
17 decided
390
Total decisions
27 refused in the year to March 2026