LAND AT THE CANOPIES, Corner of Milton Hill and Trenchard Avenue, Milton, OX14 4DR Data via plota.co.uk

P26/V0516/TPO - Works to TPO Approved

Proposal

T8 - Ash (TPO W1) - Reduce crown height and lateral spread by up to 3m around the perimeter of the canopy, pruning back to suitable growth points. - Reduce dead or decaying stubs back to the next growth point, if no suitable growth points are present prune back to the main stem. - Remove ivy from the main stem. - All pruning cuts must be made at suitable branch junctions, leaving sufficient live growth to maintain or enhance crown form. (Amended specification agreed by Sylva Consultancy on the 26 March 2026 via email) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
28 Feb 2026
✓
Approved
27 Mar 2026

Approved on 27 Mar 2026 · Last checked 25 Sept 2026

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
National infrastructure project about 1850 m away: White Horse Reservoir (previously known as South East Strategic Reservoir Option), at pre-application.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Vale of White Horse - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Works to TPO
Postcode
OX14 4DR
Received
28 Feb 2026
Validated
28 Feb 2026
Case officer
Show
Target decision
25 Apr 2026
Decision
Consent TPO works
Decision date
27 Mar 2026
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 27 days from validation, 8 days slower than Vale of White Horse's median of 19 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 100% of tree and landscaping works here are.

99%decided within 8 weeks
100%approved
243decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Vale of White Horse in the last twelve months, from validation. Vale of White Horse decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 25 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
25 Apr 2026
Vale of White Horse
Planning Authority Score
4.5/10
Below average
#176 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Vale of White Horse ranks #198 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 51% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Vale of White Horse decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #32 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #64 of 296
57%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #198 of 296
51%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #232 of 296
86%
Minor dwellings approved
83 decided (1-9 homes)
88%
Major dwellings approved
16 decided (10+ homes)
90%
Change of use approved
31 decided
1,015
Total decisions
51 refused in the year to March 2026