77 Hall Lane, Chingford, London, E4 8HW Data via plota.co.uk
Description
Change of use from a single-family dwelling house (Use Class C3) to a House of Multiple Occupation (HMO) comprising 5 people (Use Class C4) Data via plota.co.uk
Other new applications on this street
97 Hall Lane, Chingford, London, E4 8HW
Lawful Development Certificate (Proposed) - Construction of a roof extension abo...
299 Hall Lane, Chingford, London, E4 8NU
Removal of telephone kiosk PO PCO1 on public footpath adjacent to 299 Hall Lane,...
220 Hall Lane, Chingford, London, E4 8EY
Removal of telephone kiosk PCO1 on public footpath adjacent to 220 Hall Lane, E4
135 Hall Lane, Chingford, London, E4 8HU
Formation of a dropped kerb and vehicle crossover to allow vehicular access.
Nearby new applications
89 Marmion Avenue, Chingford, London, E4 8EJ
Lawful Development Certificate (Proposed) – Construction of a single storey rear...
16 Middleton Close, Chingford, London, E4 8EA
Prior approval for the construction of a single storey rear extension which woul...
CHINGFORD MOUNT CEMETERY, 121 Old Church Road, Chingford, London, E4 6ST
Submission of details pursuant to condition 21 (Landscape Management Plan), cond...
299 Hall Lane, Chingford, London, E4 8NU
Removal of telephone kiosk PO PCO1 on public footpath adjacent to 299 Hall Lane,...
220 Hall Lane, Chingford, London, E4 8EY
Removal of telephone kiosk PCO1 on public footpath adjacent to 220 Hall Lane, E4
74 Waltham Way, Chingford, London, E4 8HE
Construction of a single storey rear extension.
Historical activity at this location
27 previous applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.
Previous applications at this address
Nearby activity
Waltham Forest is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #81 out of 292. Only 20% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 40% national average - the council usually decides on time. Waltham Forest is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 77% approved vs 90% nationally.
