Replacement self-build dwelling at Glendale, Camp Lane, Warmington, Banbury

What was proposed

The application proposed demolishing the existing dwelling and building a replacement self-build dwelling with associated works.

“Application Ref. 25/02520/FUL Site Address: Glendale, Camp Lane, Warmington Description of Development: Demolition of existing dwelling and erection of replacement self-build dwelling and all associated works (Resubmission of previously approved application reference.”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended approval because the design was unchanged, the previous permission remained significant, and no new material considerations justified a different outcome.

“Archaeological Assessment by a CIFA accredited organisation was submitted with the previously approved application. Whilst the Archaeological report considers that the development may result in a significant impact on archaeological features, it considers that it is unlikely that any remains would warrant being preserved on site. The archaeological report recommended that a further evaluation be carried out. A condition was imposed to ensure such.”

“Given that planning permission was previously granted for the same dwelling under planning reference 20/01249/FUL, and whilst there have been some minor changes in respect of the Cotswold National Landscape and BNG, there are no new material considerations which would warrant an alternative approach in this instance. Accordingly, it is once again recommended that planning permission be granted.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Highways and environmental health raised no objection subject to conditions, while ecology withdrew its objection after further information and proposed conditions.

“Warwickshire County Council Highways (WCC Highways) No objection subject to conditions and notes (20.11.2025).”

“Environmental Health (EHO) No Objection subject to condition (05.11.2025).”

Officer report

Who spoke

A parish council representative spoke against the application and the agent spoke at the meeting.

Committee consideration

After considering the application and representations made at the meeting, members proposed granting permission in line with the recommendation.

“Having considered the application and the representations made at the meeting, a Motion of GRANT, in accordance with the recommendation detailed in the report, was proposed by Councillor Edden and seconded by Councillor Parry.”

Minutes

The vote

The motion was supported by 10 members, with one abstention.

“Thereafter, by 10 votes in favour, with 1 abstention, it was…”

Minutes

The decision

Planning permission was granted subject to the 17 conditions and two notes set out in the report.

“That Planning Application 25/02520/FUL be GRANTED subject to the following:”

“17 conditions contained in the report; and • 2 notes contained in the report.”

Minutes