Nunswood House, Burnthurst Lane, Princethorpe, Rugby, CV23 9QA Data via plota.co.uk

R26/0543 - Prior Approval change of use Refused

Proposal

Prior approval for change of use of agricultural building to dwellinghouse and associated building operations Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
29 May 2026
✓
Validated
9 Jun 2026
✓
Consultation
10 Jun 2026
✗
Refused
24 Jul 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 24 Jul 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 2 Aug 2026

Site constraints 9

CAA Bird Consultation AreaRugby District (B)Buncefield to Kingsbury Pipeline
Green belt: Birmingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
CAA Bird Consultation AreaCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Rugby District (B)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Buncefield to Kingsbury PipelineCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 3; Coalfield, development low risk area; Priority habitat 26 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Building

Floor area228 m² (2,454 sq ft)
Energy ratingE (47 out of 100), could reach C
PropertyDetached bungalow, 8 habitable rooms
Built1983 to 1990
HeatingBoiler and radiators, oil
WallsCavity wall, as built, insulated (assumed)

From the energy performance certificate lodged in September 2024, the latest held for this property. The building may have changed since. View the certificate

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rugby - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rugby
Application type
Prior Approval change of use
Postcode
CV23 9QA
Received
29 May 2026
Validated
9 Jun 2026
Ward
Dunsmore
Parish
Princethorpe
Case officer
Show
Target decision
24 Jul 2026
Decision
Refusal
Decision date
24 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Acorus Rural Property Services

How this decision compares

Decided in 45 days from validation, 7 days faster than Rugby's median of 52 for new homes. Refused, as 28% of new homes here are.

52%decided within 8 weeks
72%approved
13%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Rugby in the last twelve months, from validation. Rugby decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14968989
Comments by
1 Jul 2026
Site or press notice
10 Jun 2026
Statutory expiry
1 Jul 2026
Rugby
Planning Authority Score
2.7/10
Poor
#243 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Rugby is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #271 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 57% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rugby decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #65 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #115 of 296
38%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #271 of 296
57%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #260 of 296
93%
Minor dwellings approved
28 decided (1-9 homes)
71%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
88%
Change of use approved
8 decided
466
Total decisions
31 refused in the year to March 2026

Energy performance: Energy performance certificates from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright 2026.