Land To The Front Of Bay Cottage 28 Sunderland Bridge DH6 5HD Data via plota.co.uk

DM/26/01717/TPO - Tree Preservation Order Withdrawn

Proposal

Horse Chestnut (T1) - crown lift to 2.5m, crown reduce and reshape by 2.5m and prune light branches by 0.5m Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
3 Jul 2026
✓
Validated
14 Jul 2026
✓
Consultation
16 Jul 2026
−
Withdrawn
6 Aug 2026

Withdrawn on 6 Aug 2026 · Last checked 26 Aug 2026

Site constraints 11

Coal mining development high risk area
Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment.
From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.
Coal mining risk assessments ↗
Sunderland Bridge conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Registered park or garden 73 m away: Croxdale Hall
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
2 listed buildings within 150 m; Radon affected area, class 2; Scheduled monument 244 m away: Sunderland Bridge, near Croxdale; Heritage at risk 73 m away: Croxdale Hall; Inside the Croxdale built-up area; Green belt 28 m away: Tyne and Wear; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Durham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Durham
Application type
Tree Preservation Order
Postcode
DH6 5HD
Received
3 Jul 2026
Validated
14 Jul 2026
Ward
Bowburn And Coxhoe
Parish
Croxdale And Hett
Case officer
Show
Target decision
8 Sept 2026
Decision
Application Withdrawn
Decision date
6 Aug 2026
Applicant
Show

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 26 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15057561
Planning Portal ref
PP-15057561
Consultation
16 Jul 2026
Comments by
6 Aug 2026
Statutory expiry
8 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
Durham
Planning Authority Score
5.2/10
Average
#137 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Durham ranks #190 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 48% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Durham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #52 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #29 of 296
59%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #190 of 296
48%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #213 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
95 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
49 decided (10+ homes)
87%
Change of use approved
201 decided
1,706
Total decisions
113 refused in the year to March 2026