Old Yarr Blaze Lane Astwood Bank Worcestershire B96 6QA Data via plota.co.uk

26/00395/FUL - Full Application Refused

Proposal

Partial retention of, and partial alteration to stable building Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
31 Mar 2026
Consultation
17 Apr 2026
Refused
28 Aug 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 28 Aug 2026 · Last checked 28 Aug 2026

Documents 21

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Green belt: Birmingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Other Priority Habitats -NEX
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Priority habitat 15 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redditch - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Redditch
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
B96 6QA
Received
31 Mar 2026
Validated
31 Mar 2026
Ward
Astwood Bank And Feckenham Ward
Parish
Feckenham Parish
Case officer
Show
Target decision
21 Aug 2026
Decision
Application Refusal
Decision date
28 Aug 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
SF Planning Limited

How this decision compares

Decided in 150 days from validation, 96 days slower than Redditch's median of 54 for full applications. Refused, as 6% of full applications here are.

62%decided within 8 weeks
94%approved
7%go to committee

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Redditch in the last twelve months, from validation. Redditch decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 28 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14820961
Consultation
17 Apr 2026
Site or press notice
1 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Redditch
Planning Authority Score
8.7/10
Excellent
#12 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Redditch is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #69 out of 296. Only 24% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 98% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
98% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redditch decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #25 of 296
98%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #22 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #69 of 296
24%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #27 of 296
90%
Minor dwellings approved
10 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
6 decided (10+ homes)
75%
Change of use approved
4 decided
160
Total decisions
8 refused in the year to March 2026