1 Stonehills Steventon Hampshire RG25 3BA Data via plota.co.uk

T/00324/26/TCA - Works to Trees - Conservation Areas Pending

Proposal

T1 - Sycamore: Fell to ground level. Reason: Tree causes excessive shading to the property and possesses low amenity value due to poor form T2 - Willow: Fell to ground level. Reason: Tree causes excessive shading to the property and possesses low amenity value due to poor form T3 - Sycamore: Crown lift to 4m from ground level and crown thin by 15% to increase light penetration T4 - Sycamore: Crown lift to 10m from ground level and crown reduction by 2m (all cardinal points) to reduce excessive shading to the property T5 - Horse Chestnut: Fell to ground level. Reason: Tree has previously lost a major structural limb, leaving a significant entry wound for decay, and causes excessive shading T6 - Yew Hedge: Fell/remove hedge. Reason: Causes excessive shading to adjacent garden areas and possesses low amenity value T7 - Sycamore: Crown lift to 4m from ground level and crown thin by 15% to increase clearance to power cable T8 - Cooking Apple: Crown thin by 15% and crown reduction by 1m to increase clearance to telephone cable T9 - Cooking Apple: Crown thin by 15% and crown reduction by 1m to increase clearance to telephone cable T10 - Crab Apple Tree: Crown thin by 15% and crown reduction by 1m to increase clearance to telephone cable… Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗

Application progress

Received
22 Jul 2026
Validated
23 Jul 2026
Decision
Awaiting decision

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet.

Important details

Application type
Works to Trees - Conservation Areas
Postcode
RG25 3BA
Received
22 Jul 2026
Validated
23 Jul 2026
Ward
Oakley & The Candovers
Parish
STEVENTON CP
Case officer
Show
Target decision
3 Sept 2026
Applicant
Show

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15083569
Env. assessment
No
Basingstoke
Planning Authority Score
5.1/10
Average
#143 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Basingstoke ranks #189 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Basingstoke decision performance
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #75 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #49 of 296
59%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #189 of 296
46%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #198 of 296
75%
Minor dwellings approved
150 decided (1-9 homes)
63%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
32 decided
1,076
Total decisions
90 refused in the year to March 2026