Greenglade Forest School The Drive Denholme Bradford West Yorkshire BD13 4FH Data via plota.co.uk

26/01900/TPO - Tree Preservation Order Decided

Proposal

T44 Fagus sylvatica Location: alcove.chainsaw.chairs - Fell. T57 Aesculus hippocastanum Location: dentistry.daffodils.punctured - Fell. T65 Acer pseudoplatanusLocation: majors.piglet.refrained - Fell. T81 Aesculus hippocastanumLocation: renew.small.ridiculed - Remove 2 stems on west side of the tree. T22 Fraxinus excelsior Location: dispenser.boldest.initiated - Fell. Tree T155 Species: Ulmus laevisLocation (W3W): trombone.endlessly.situated - Reduce to a 3 metre monolith. Felled trees will be replaced on a like foe like basis or with suitable native species. NB The removal of deadwood does not require consent. Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.

View original council record ↗Last checked 24 Aug 2026, 09:19

Street View

Application progress

✓

Received

28 May 2026

✓

Part Grant Part Refusal of TPO Case

6 Aug 2026

Part Grant Part Refusal of TPO Case on 6 Aug 2026 · Senior Planning Officer · Last checked 7 Aug 2026

Documents 4

Site constraints 8

Green belt: South and West Yorkshire

Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.

Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.

Read the government guidance ↗

Habitat network: Other Priority Habitats -NEX

Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.

Also on the record

Nature recovery project: Bradford and South Pennines; Radon affected area, class 4; National infrastructure project: Calderdale Energy Park, at pre-application; Coalfield, development low risk area; Priority habitat 7 m away: Deciduous woodland; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.

Not affected

Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Bradford - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

25 Aug 2026Pending

7 Seven Acres Denholme Bradford West Yorkshire BD13 4NF

Construction of single storey rear extension

26/02977/HOU

Important details

Council: Bradford
Application type: Tree Preservation Order
Postcode: BD13 4FH
Received: 28 May 2026
Validated: 28 May 2026
Ward: Worth Valley (Ward 29)
Parish: Denholme Parish Town Council
Case officer: Show
Target decision: 23 Jul 2026
Decision: Part Grant Part Refusal of TPO Case
Decision date: 6 Aug 2026
Decision level: Senior Planning Officer
Applicant: Show

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 7 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference: PP-14967875
Planning Portal ref: PP-14967875
Statutory expiry: 23 Jul 2026
Env. assessment: No

Bradford

Planning Authority Score

3.9/10

Below average

#195 of 296 councils

Relevant to this application:

Householder decisions

Bradford ranks #192 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (89%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance

Bradford decision statistics

Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026

86%

Overall approval rate

Below avg (87%) #188 of 296

89%

Householder approved

Below avg (90%) #200 of 296

58%

Decided in 8 weeks

Below avg (63%) #192 of 296

40%

Extended time limit

Below avg (41%) #148 of 296

79%

Minor dwellings approved

252 decided (1-9 homes)

86%

Major dwellings approved

22 decided (10+ homes)

76%

Change of use approved

101 decided

2,322

Total decisions

323 refused in the year to March 2026