Ryhall Hall Church Street Ryhall Rutland PE9 4HR Data via plota.co.uk

2026/0505/LBA - Listed Building Application Approved

Proposal

Installation of a stainless steel flexible flue liner in each of the side stack chimneys to the north. Installation of a chimney cowl over each of the 2 chimney flues. Replacement guttering to the north elevation. Reduction in height of a modern chimney on the north elevation. Remove the infill render (cement onto galvanised mesh) around the arched Georgian window on the north elevation. If the stonework beneath is sound, it is proposed to remove this render to allow the stonework to breathe. In the alternative if the stonework beneath is not sound, it is proposed to remove the cement render and replace it with a lime render which will allow the stonework to breathe. Replacement roof of single storey extension to the north elevation with rolled metal. Repair and repaint all windows. Replace timber finish gates with wrought iron gates. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
28 Apr 2026
✓
Validated
13 May 2026
✓
Consultation
8 Jun 2026
✓
Approved
19 Aug 2026

Approved on 19 Aug 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 19 Aug 2026

Documents 25

Consultation & comments 4

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 22 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF EMAIL FROM APPLICANT IN REPSONSE TO HISTORIC ENGLAND COMMENTS Correspondence · 8 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 3 Jun 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representations · 1 Jun 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 7

Grade II* listed: The Hall
List entry 1361527 · 3 m away · 8 more listed buildings within 150 m (1 Grade I, 7 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 8 with distances
Historic England ↗
Ryhall conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
National infrastructure project 590 m away: Mallard Pass Solar Project
The site is 590 m from the project boundary. Generating station, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Ryhall built-up area; Priority habitat 34 m away: Deciduous woodland; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rutland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rutland
Application type
Listed Building Application
Postcode
PE9 4HR
Received
28 Apr 2026
Validated
13 May 2026
Ward
Ryhall And Casterton Ward
Parish
Ryhall Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
8 Jul 2026
Decision
Approve
Decision date
19 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 98 days from validation, 43 days slower than Rutland's median of 55 for extensions. Approved, as 85% of extensions here are.

78%decided within 8 weeks
85%approved
222decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Rutland in the last twelve months, from validation. Rutland decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 19 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14894261
Planning Portal ref
PP-14894261
Consultation
8 Jun 2026
Comments by
22 Jun 2026
Site or press notice
20 May 2026
Statutory expiry
8 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Rutland
Planning Authority Score
6.2/10
Average
#93 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Rutland is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #87 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rutland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #142 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #164 of 296
74%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #87 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #91 of 296
65%
Minor dwellings approved
43 decided (1-9 homes)
87%
Major dwellings approved
15 decided (10+ homes)
83%
Change of use approved
24 decided
520
Total decisions
57 refused in the year to March 2026