Unit 30 Main Concourse Victoria Station Terminus Place London SW1V 1JU Data via plota.co.uk

26/04912/LBC - Listed Building Consent Application Approved

Proposal

Alterations to Unit 30, including shopfront alterations, signage, installation of air conditioning plant on the adjacent flat roof, and associated works to the remote storage unit. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
22 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
24 Aug 2026

Approved on 24 Aug 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 24 Sept 2026

Documents 39

Plans & drawings 28

PDF PROPOSED HVAC LAYOUT Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF LOCATION PLAN Location Plan · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED OUTDOOR SEATING Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF IMPULSE UNIT DETAIL Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF MID FLOOR TABLE DETAIL Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF CONDIMENT UNIT DETAIL Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PARTITION WALL AND FLOOR DETAIL Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED REMOTE STORE CONTAINMENT Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED GF AND MEZZ CONTAINMENT Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED REMOTE STORE FIRE STRATEGY ZONE PLAN Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED GF AND MEZZ FIRE STRATEGY ZONE PLAN Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED REMOTE STORE SECTIONS AND ELEVATIONS Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED RCP POWER Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED REMOTE STORE GA AND SETTING OUT PLAN Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED FF AND E LAYOUT Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED LOW WALL DETAILS Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED BACK BAR Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SECTIONS Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SHOPFRONT Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED RCP POWER Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED FLOORING Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED GF, MEZZ SET OUT Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED GF, MEZZ GA Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING SHOPFRONT SECTIONS Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING POWER AND RCP Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SHOPFRONT Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING SHOPFRONT SECTIONS Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF RAIL / GLAZING MOUNTED LETTERS Drawing · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 12

Grade II listed: Victoria Railway Station the Former London, Chatham and Dover Railway Station Including Train Shed
List entry 1266689 · The pin is inside its outline · 4 more listed buildings within 150 m (2 Grade II*, 2 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 4 with distances
Historic England ↗
2 Article 4 directions
Article 4 Basement Development Permitted Rights Removed · Article 4 Direction Class E To C3 In Central Activities Zone. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From the sea. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
Archaeological priority area: City of Westminster APA 3.2
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Westminster AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
National infrastructure project 599 m away: Thames Tideway Tunnel
The site is 599 m from the project boundary. Waste water treatment, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted. Also within 2 km: London Strategic Heat Main Project (at pre-application, 30 m).
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Central activities zone
The core of central London in the London Plan.
Offices, culture and the other strategic functions of the centre take priority over new housing here.
Opportunity area
Where the London Plan expects significant growth.
Boundaries are indicative and the borough holds the detailed plan.
Also on the record
Conservation area 76 m away: Grosvenor Gardens; Registered park or garden 245 m away: Eccleston Square; Inside the City of Westminster built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 6b (excellent), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Westminster - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Listed Building Consent Application
Postcode
SW1V 1JU
Received
22 Jul 2026
Validated
22 Jul 2026
Ward
Pimlico North
Case officer
Show
Target decision
16 Sept 2026
Decision
Application Permitted
Decision date
24 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Agent
JMS Planning & Development Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 33 days from validation, 21 days faster than Westminster's median of 54 for commercial premises. Approved, as 87% of commercial premises here are.

56%decided within 8 weeks
87%approved
952decided in the last year

Plota live figures for commercial premises decided by Westminster in the last twelve months, from validation. Westminster decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 24 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15103982
Planning Portal ref
PP-15103982
Env. assessment
No
Westminster
Planning Authority Score
3.5/10
Below average
#221 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Westminster is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #258 out of 296. Only 28% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Westminster is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 81% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 81% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Westminster decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
86%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #201 of 296
81%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #277 of 296
44%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #258 of 296
28%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #46 of 296
83%
Minor dwellings approved
12 decided (1-9 homes)
67%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
133 decided
4,602
Total decisions
648 refused in the year to March 2026