Manor Farm, Russell Hill, Thornhaugh, Peterborough, PE8 6HL Data via plota.co.uk

26/002135/DISCHG - Compliance with Planning Condition(s) Decided

Proposal

Discharge of condition C3 (stone material) to listed building consent Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
19 Mar 2026
✓
Consultation
10 Apr 2026
✓
Determined
1 May 2026

Determined on 1 May 2026 · Delegated Decision (Officer) · Last checked 12 Jul 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    Listed buildingApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 3 decided (outcome not recorded)

    • ConditionsDischarge of condition C3 (stone material)This application26/002135/DISCHG

Site constraints 11

Great Crested Newt Risk ZonesCIL Charge ZonesSSSI Buffer ZoneListed building
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 6
An estimated 30% or more of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
National infrastructure project 685 m away: A47 Wansford to Sutton
The site is 685 m from the project boundary. Highway, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Conservation area 13 m away: Thornhaugh Conservation Area
The edge of the area; work outside it can still affect its setting.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Great Crested Newt Risk ZonesCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
CIL Charge ZonesCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
SSSI Buffer ZoneCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Listed buildingCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
7 listed buildings within 150 m; SSSI 404 m away: West Abbot's and Lound Woods SSSI.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Peterborough - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Compliance with Planning Condition(s)
Postcode
PE8 6HL
Received
19 Mar 2026
Validated
19 Mar 2026
Ward
Wittering
Parish
Thornhaugh
Case officer
Show
Target decision
13 May 2026
Decision
Determined
Decision date
1 May 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision (Officer)
Applicant
Show

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
29 Apr 2026
Site or press notice
9 Apr 2026
Peterborough
Planning Authority Score
5.2/10
Average
#139 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Peterborough ranks #141 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (89%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Peterborough decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #240 of 296
89%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #206 of 296
67%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #141 of 296
33%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #80 of 296
67%
Minor dwellings approved
42 decided (1-9 homes)
67%
Major dwellings approved
18 decided (10+ homes)
60%
Change of use approved
80 decided
665
Total decisions
115 refused in the year to March 2026