The Lodge Main Street Fiskerton NG25 0UL Data via plota.co.uk

25/02156/TWCA - Tree Work In Conservation Area Approved

Proposal

A. Golden leylandii: remove as it has become too large for the garden and interferes with neighbour's light. B. Hawthorn: remove as it is mostly dead. C. Weeping willow: pollard back to previous pollarding cuts to manage tree size. D. Golden leylandii: remove as it has become too large for location. E. Golden leylandii: remove as it has become too large for location and overhanging flood embankment. F. Italian Alder: remove as it is damaging fence and overhanging flood embankment. G. Cherry: prune branches to take about 1/3rd off crown to manage tree size. H. Rowan: cut off dead branches and those overhanging garden close to the house. J. Plum: cut off branches overhanging garden close to the house. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
31 Dec 2025
✓
Validated
2 Jan 2026
✓
Approved
3 Feb 2026

Approved on 3 Feb 2026 · Delegated Officer · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Site constraints 6

Flood zone 2, rivers and sea
Medium chance: between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000 annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 to 1 in 1,000 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Fiskerton conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Also on the record
3 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin; Inside the Fiskerton (Newark and Sherwood) built-up area; Flood defence about 43 m from the postcode pin (wall); Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 2, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 1

Last sold for £237,500 in September 1995. Detached house, freehold.

29 September 1995£237,500

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Newark and Sherwood - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Tree Work In Conservation Area
Postcode
NG25 0UL
Received
31 Dec 2025
Validated
2 Jan 2026
Ward
Trent
Parish
Fiskerton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
13 Feb 2026
Decision
No Objection
Decision date
3 Feb 2026
Decision level
Delegated Officer
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 32 days from validation, 4 days slower than Newark and Sherwood's median of 28 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 98% of tree and landscaping works here are.

99%decided within 8 weeks
98%approved
360decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Newark and Sherwood in the last twelve months, from validation. Newark and Sherwood decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14594590
Planning Portal ref
PP-14594590
Statutory expiry
13 Feb 2026
Env. assessment
No
Newark and Sherwood
Planning Authority Score
3.9/10
Below average
#198 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Newark and Sherwood is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #241 out of 296. 54% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Newark and Sherwood decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #88 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #55 of 296
50%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #241 of 296
54%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #244 of 296
80%
Minor dwellings approved
110 decided (1-9 homes)
88%
Major dwellings approved
25 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
33 decided
767
Total decisions
63 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.