Land Off Sand Lane Spalford Data via plota.co.uk

25/02146/PIP - Permission in Principle Refused

Proposal

Application for permission in principle for a residential development of up to a maximum of 2 dwellings and a minimum of one Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
24 Dec 2025
✓
Validated
5 Jan 2026
✓
Consultation
5 Feb 2026
✓
Committee
12 Feb 2026
✗
Refused
16 Feb 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 16 Feb 2026 · Planning Committee · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Newark and Sherwood Planning Committee on 12 Feb 2026.

Refused by 12 votes to 1

Against officer advice: officers had recommended approval.

  • Officers advised approval because the location, land use and number of homes were acceptable in principle, subject to later technical details.
  • Residents objected over flooding, highway safety, infrastructure, wildlife and overlooking, while the ward member questioned the site’s suitability.
  • The committee refused permission in principle by 12 votes to 1, citing policy, flooding, sustainability and the area’s character.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, objections, committee debate, vote and reasons for refusal.

Source: Plota analysis of Newark and Sherwood's committee minutes of 12 Feb 2026.

Documents 25

Consultation & comments 9

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 10 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 10 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF SPALFORD PARISH Consultee Comment · 5 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF NSDC CONTAMINATED LAND Consultee Comment · 28 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF NCC HIGHWAYS Consultee Comment · 26 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour or Public Comment · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Consultee Comment · 14 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Consultee Comment · 14 Jan 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Public footpath about 23 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Newark and Sherwood - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Permission in Principle
Postcode
NG23 7HF
Received
24 Dec 2025
Validated
5 Jan 2026
Ward
Collingham
Parish
Spalford
Case officer
Show
Target decision
9 Feb 2026
Decision
Application Refused
Decision date
16 Feb 2026
Decision level
Planning Committee
Applicant
Show
Agent
Fytche-Taylor Planning Ltd - Mr Daniel Evans

How this decision compares

Decided in 42 days from validation, 22 days faster than Newark and Sherwood's median of 64 for new homes. Refused, as 14% of new homes here are.

36%decided within 8 weeks
86%approved
14%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Newark and Sherwood in the last twelve months, from validation. Newark and Sherwood decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
5 Feb 2026
Env. assessment
No
Newark and Sherwood
Planning Authority Score
3.9/10
Below average
#198 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Newark and Sherwood is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #241 out of 296. 54% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Newark and Sherwood decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #88 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #55 of 296
50%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #241 of 296
54%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #244 of 296
80%
Minor dwellings approved
110 decided (1-9 homes)
88%
Major dwellings approved
25 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
33 decided
767
Total decisions
63 refused in the year to March 2026