1 to 9 homes at Land West Of Eakring Road, Bilsthorpe
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Newark And Sherwood Planning Committee on 12 Mar 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought permission in principle for between one and nine homes, with detailed design reserved for a later technical consent stage.
“The application seeks Permission in Principle (the first of a 2-stage process) for residential development of a minimum of 1 dwelling and a maximum of 9 dwellings. No specific details are required at this stage.”
“As the proposal is for permission in principle, no site plan or elevational details are required to be submitted at this stage. Such details would be considered at the Technical Details Consent stage, if permission in principle is approved.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site is a 0.99-hectare agricultural field outside Bilsthorpe, beside sports facilities, a business park, a bus stop, a footpath and a bridleway.
“The application site comprises of rectangular parcel of agricultural land measuring 0.99 hectares in area, located to the west Eakring Road to the north of Bilsthorpe. The site currently comprises of flat agricultural land bounded by established hedges.”
“To the south lies Bilsthorpe Sports Ground, which includes a small cluster of single storey buildings fronting onto Eakring Road, with playing pitches beyond. The remainder of the site is surrounded by open countryside. Further to east of the site is Bilsthorpe Business Park, which comprises of industrial warehouse type buildings set back from Eakring Road, behind a wide tree belt.”
Officer report
Planning history
The report states that the site has no relevant planning history.
“The application site has no relevant history.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the location, residential use and amount of development were acceptable in principle under the planning balance.
“The application proposes between 1 and 9 dwellings. The site covers approximately 0.99 hectares. The general accepted density for new residential development within the district is 30 dwellings per hectare. The maximum number of dwellings on site would be 9, which equates to an approximate density of 9 dwellings per hectare.”
“In this instance, the site is considered to be within the open countryside outside the built-up village of Bilsthorpe. Officers are of the view that there are no impacts at this stage that would warrant refusal when applying the tilted balance in accordance with paragraph 11(d) of the NPPF, which favours the presumption in favour of sustainable development unless there are convincing issues which would warrant refusal.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
The parish council raised infrastructure concerns, highways found up to nine homes acceptable in principle, and the rights of way team objected at this stage.
“Bilsthorpe Parish Council – raised concerns relating to additional pressure any development would have on the facilities and infrastructure in the area.”
“Following a review of the submitted information, it is considered that the principle of providing up to nine residential dwellings at this location is acceptable. Should Permission in Principle be granted, the applicant should refer to the Nottinghamshire Highway Design Guide for access design.”
Officer report
Who spoke
Members heard a presentation from the Senior Planning Officer, including photographs and plans of the proposed development.
Members’ concerns
Members questioned the need to use agricultural land, the lack of a footpath along the site and the risk of ribbon development.
“Members considered the application, and it was commented that the use of agricultural land for housing development was not necessary. Members were also concerned that there was no footpath running along the site and a ribbon effect of development would start if this was approved which was considered inappropriate to the village.”
Minutes
The vote
The approval motion was lost, with four votes for, eight against and one abstention.
“A vote was taken and lost for Approval, with 4 votes For, 8 votes Against and 1 Abstention.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The resolution gives these reasons:
“For reason of refusal to be delegated to the Business Manager – Planning Development. In accordance with paragraph 18.5 of the Planning Protocol, as the motion was against Officer recommendation, a recorded vote was taken. Councillor Vote C Brooks Against L Dales Against S Ford Against A Freeman For P Harris For M Home For K Melton Abstention D Moore For P Rainbow For S Saddington For M Spoors For L Tift For T Wildgust Against”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- Newark And Sherwood Planning Committee minutes, 12 March 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Newark And Sherwood's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Newark And Sherwood
- Date
- Thursday 12 March 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Refused, against officer advice
- Vote
- 8 for refusal, 4 against, 1 abstained
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Newark And Sherwood committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
41 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 11 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.