Street Record Kingston Lane Winford Data via plota.co.uk

26/P/1441/TPO - Works to TPO Approved
Trees & landscaping

Proposal

Page 23 and 24 of the attached risk assessment lists remedial work required: T64 Sycamore. Prune back lateral growth by 1m on southwest aspect. Crown lift to 4m. T65 Grey poplar (had previous remidial work but deadwood remains). Remove major deadwood and broken suspended limbs. T66 Field maple (has had previous remedial work but has grown back over the street light). Prune back from streetlight to clear by 1m. T67 Field maple Crown lift to 1.8m minor growth only. T68 Field maple Crown lift to 1.8m minor growth only. T69 Field maple Crown lift to 1.8m minor growth only. T70 Field maple Crown lift to 1.8m minor growth only due to concerns that the growth is overhanging the highway, a tree surgeon has inspected the trees and does not believe any birds are currently nesting in them. Remedial work is required asap. Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
9 Jul 2026
✓
Validated
22 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
15 Sept 2026

Approved on 15 Sept 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 16 Sept 2026

Documents 3

Decision & officer reports 2

PDF DECISION NOTICE Decision Notice · 15 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF TREE OFFICER REPORT Delegated Report · 15 Sept 2026 View ↗

Application forms 1

PDF APPLICATIONFORMREDACTED Application Form · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 5

Green belt: Bath and Bristol
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Public footpath 10 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in North Somerset - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
North Somerset
Application type
Works to TPO
Received
9 Jul 2026
Validated
22 Jul 2026
Ward
Winford
Parish
Winford
Case officer
Show
Target decision
16 Sept 2026
Decision
Approve
Decision date
15 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 55 days from validation, 6 days slower than North Somerset's median of 49 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 95% of tree and landscaping works here are.

61%decided within 8 weeks
95%approved
315decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by North Somerset in the last twelve months, from validation. North Somerset decision record →

Public comments

2comments received
2 supporting

16 neighbours consulted · Last counted 16 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
12 Aug 2026
Statutory expiry
16 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No

Historical activity at this location

7 nearby applications on record - archival context, not part of the live application.

Within ~100m

Nearby activity

2021 Approved
8 Moorlay Crescent Winford Bristol BS40 8DB
Demolition of existing rear conservatory; proposed erection of a single storey, part two…
21/P/0260/FUH
2020 Approved
20 Moorlay Crescent Winford BS40 8DB
Minor material amendment to planning permission 18/P/3096/FUH (Conversion of car port to…
20/P/1277/MMA
2018 Approved
10 Moorlay Crescent Winford Bristol BS40 8DB
First floor extension over existing single storey extension.
18/P/4591/FUH
2018 Approved
18 Moorlay Crescent Winford Bristol BS40 8DB
Single storey side extension
18/P/4103/FUH
2018 Approved
20 Moorlay Crescent Winford Bristol BS40 8DB
Conversion of car port to living accommodation with bedroom over and single storey extens…
18/P/3096/FUH
2017 Approved
9 Moorlay Crescent Winford BS40 8DB
Erection of a single storey conservatory at the rear of the property
17/P/0880/F
2016 Decided
6 Moorlay Crescent Winford BS40 8DB
T1-T3 birch - reduce height by 3m and spread by 2m
16/P/2361/TPO
North Somerset
Planning Authority Score
6.4/10
Average
#83 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

North Somerset is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #96 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
North Somerset decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #137 of 296
93%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #134 of 296
73%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #96 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #88 of 296
74%
Minor dwellings approved
135 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
85%
Change of use approved
52 decided
1,139
Total decisions
128 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings