General storage buildings at Former Forest View Nurseries, Newburgh

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by West Lancashire Planning Committee on 30 Jul 2026.

2025/1054/COUApproved

What was proposed

The application sought permission to change former horticulture buildings, including glasshouses and polytunnels, to general storage, with no building works.

“To advise Planning Committee on an application which seeks planning permission for the change of use of former horticulture buildings comprising glass housing and polytunnels to permit general storage (Use Class B8). No building works are proposed.”

“Planning permission is sought for the change of use of former horticulture buildings comprising glass housing and polytunnels to permit general storage (Use Class B8).”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site is agricultural land in the Green Belt, with existing access, hardstanding and internal roads, beside a holiday park, homes and a farm.

“Forest View Holiday Park is adjacent and to the west of the site whilst there also are residential properties and a farm adjacent to and in the locality of the site.”

“There is an existing vehicular access from Back Lane which leads into the site which is served by a series of hardstanding and internal roads.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

Earlier decisions included approval for flexible commercial use of the main glasshouse and refusals for residential and camping-related proposals.

“2024/0572/PNC Application for determination as to whether prior approval of details is required - Change of use from agricultural building to flexible commercial use. Prior Approval NOT required 06/09/2024.”

“2016/0998/COU Change of use from holiday accommodation to residential dwelling. Refused.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval, finding the proposal acceptable in principle and concluding that its adverse impacts would not be significant subject to conditions.

“The application is therefore recommended for approval.”

Officer report

Main planning impacts

Officers considered that the proposal would preserve Green Belt openness and would not significantly harm visual amenity, neighbours, highway safety, ecology or minerals.

“In respect to impacts on the openness of the Green Belt, it is noted that most activities would take place within the buildings and any cars and other vehicles parked outside would not result in any greater impact on openness than the machinery and vehicles that would have serviced the former horticultural business. Overall, it is considered that the proposal would preserve the openness of the Green Belt.”

“In conclusion it is considered that the proposal meets the exception in paragraph 154(h) iv. of the NPPF and therefore would not constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Highways raised initial requests but later had no objection; environmental protection recommended a noise condition, while the parish council objected on highway grounds.

“Environmental Protection – The proposed development is located adjacent to residential properties that may be adversely affected by noise from sound sources associated with the proposed development.”

“Newburgh Parish Council – Objection, summarised as follows:”

Officer report

Local objections

One neighbour objected because of possible noise disturbance and effects on highway safety and capacity.

“Objections have been received from one neighbour. The comments are summarised as follows:”

“Noise disturbance • Impact on Highway safety and capacity…”

Officer report

Permission conditions

The recommended conditions restrict the use to storage, control delivery times and lighting, and require the buildings to operate as one unit.

“Before the relevant part of the work is begun, details of all permanent lighting (including all floodlighting, external building lights and car park lights) shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The submitted details shall include details of the lighting specification, lux levels and a light spillage plan, to minimise any adverse impact of lighting on nearby properties.”

“The existing buildings hereby permitted shall be used as one unit to the main glasshouse and shall not be sub-divided unless the written permission of the Local Planning Authority has been sought and obtained beforehand.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

After the application had been deferred from an earlier meeting, the committee granted permission subject to the stated conditions.

“Therefore, as the application had been deferred from 18 June 2026 Committee, Councillors G Owen and J Witter, who were not present when this item was first discussed, was unable to vote or take part in the debate.”

“RESOLVED: That planning permission is granted subject to conditions set out on pages 65 - 66 of the Public Reports Pack for the 18th of June 2026 Planning Committee.”

Minutes

Sources

  • West Lancashire Planning Committee minutes, 30 July 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of West Lancashire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Thursday 30 July 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

33 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →